this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
519 points (96.1% liked)

tumblr

3386 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

100% a person. Someone would be shot alright, it won't be me and that'll be easier to deal with than the roaches. A phone call to the coroner and $5 worth of peroxide and bleach (along with maybe $10 of 5.56 or $5 of 9mm) is much easier than having to book a hotel that takes cats, move me and my cats, and pay a guy to poison my house, and trash or move all food outside the fridge (I assume, because poison), and the catbox, etc. And it's not just the 1000, if there's 1000 visible, there's way more.

[–] TheSambassador@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, because the trama of killing another human being is definitely fine and something you just get over with.

Also why are we assuming that the attic person is aggressive? Maybe they just need a place to stay.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Eh idk, of course this is one of those "you'll never know until you're in the situation" things but idt I'd have that much trauma for protecting my life as need be especially in my own home. I mean, I'm frankly just as likely to have trauma from having my space invaded without my knowledge or consent as I am to have it from dealing with said situation tbh. He's the one who decided to thrust this situation on both of us, I blame him.

Breaking into someone's house and living there without their consent is aggressive. You're only saying that because I'm a man clearly capable of defending myself, what if some guy was sleeping in your mom or daughter's attic? Would it creep you out to know they have complete access to your family members while they are unconscious every night? You'd be fine with that, you'd say "well how do you know he wants to molest you in your sleep, maybe he just needs a place to stay?" And why does he have the right to take my house, the place I pay for where I'm supposed to be able to feel safe, and decide it is his now? What gives him the right, necessity? Why does it need to be my attic, aren't there people like you who are comfortable with strangers that would kindly open their doors for him?

[–] adriaan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My brother, forget about the potential trauma. You should seek help even without it.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago

I'm fine, don't attempt to kill me and you'll be fine too, problem solved.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If someone is living in your attic you don't think they have already figured out what you are armed with and are more prepared than you?

I'd take the person over the roaches too, but a person living in your attic has a knowledge advantage AND knows where you keep your weapons.

[–] KaiReeve@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My attic is a dark, cramped space with no windows and a ton of insulation. What kind of attic do you have where someone living up there can see and hear everything that happens in the main living space?

Or rather, what have you done to think that someone with a complete dossier on you has resorted to occupying your attic in order to get the jump on you?

These days if you find someone living in your attic then it's most likely a drifter looking for shelter. Better to find a man down on his luck than a large colony of pests.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

About 3 rooms of genuinely usable space where someone could live if they wanted to safe for shitty insulation and dust everywhere.

Also yeah I agree on the drifter point. on my other list I brought it up on the reasons why I'd prefer a person. There's a good chance they can be reasoned with.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Probably not, if they're living in the attic they are still a threat, but likely not an economically sound threat. I probably have the advantage in that regard, they'd need like 7k in gear and some training to be better prepared. They'll also never have access to the safe, nor the one on me, they'll have to bring their own.

If they're just in there hiding Richard Ramirez style, then it doesn't matter who is better armed, it is time to roll them dice. Frankly it's always a dice roll, I've seen a literal parishioner with a handgun take out a better armed dude with a 45yd (estimate) shot because the better armed mass shooter wasn't as good of a shot and hadn't learned his weapon properly (thankfully). What you carry matters less than getting shots on medically significant parts of your target quickly, you want to hit first and hit an area that is important, regardless of caliber, you could beat a guy with a .50cal with a .22lr, if he misses and you don't. Of course, that said, you have a higher liklihood of one of those bullets hitting a medically significant target the bigger it is and the wound channels will be different, and depending on armor which the guy in the attic likely has none of you may need the small fast bois to punch through it, but I'd take my chances.

The real issue is he has the high ground and a choke point, so if he did bring a gun that'd present the most problems. Of course, he's gotta come out sometime, and then it becomes my choke point. I suppose the real question becomes how did I discover he was there? Did I see him? Hear him banging around? Were the bangs as such that I'd go investigate myself or would I potentially involve law enforcement? All that makes a difference in the scenario. If I walk into my attic and theres just a guy up there who has the drop on me that is a kobayashi maru, but if I go up and he has a contact weapon like a bat or knife, I have the distance advantage. If I hear him up there and know it is a person somehow not just like a mouse, the cops are just getting called, I'll outsource. If I hear him and think it may be a mouse and I go to investigate, we're back to "does he have the drop on me or do I have the distance advantage."

Still, in any case, the guy will be easier to deal with than the roaches. Less time, less money, and maybe he has a gun but maybe not and maybe it doesn't matter if he does.

[–] Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your weird fantasies of killing people makes me think you should probably not own a gun.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is "if a fire breaks out in the toaster oven I'm currently cooking Buffalo Chicken flavored pizza rolls in, I will use my fire extinguisher to put out the flames" fantasies of firefighting? Don't hate the planner for being able to theorize on hypothetical situations, hate the game.

[–] Lord_ToRA@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Killing a person is not the same as putting out a fire. Since you don't seem to comprehend that it shows even more evidence that you should not have access to a gun.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 11 months ago

Right, which is why the tools used to defend yourself from people and the tools used to defend yourself from fire are different tools. Same concept though, "stop the danger before it kills me." The fact that you can't comprehend that makes you look silly, but imo you still deserve the right to defend yourself.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's not what you said though. You said a whole lot more than that.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"If the fire breaks out in the toaster oven while I'm asleep, that is a kobayashi maru. If it breaks out while I'm awake however I'll spray the fuck out of it and clean it up later, much cheaper than waiting for the fire dept to drench my house. The real issue is the fire has the initiative advantage as it starts before I can put it out, but I have smoke detectors so I'll get to it pretty quick."

There lmao.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Still nowhere near comparable to the legit wet dream you typed out earlier

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"You want to spray at the base of the fire, as that is the most effective way to put it out. Aiming at the tip gives it time to spread and doesn't effectively fight the fire."

There, that better for you? Lmao you know your opinion is meaningless to me right? All you know is I've taken the training everyone says you should be forced to take before gun ownership, the fact that you don't like what that training actually is in reality isn't my problem. It teaches you the laws regarding use of force and how to use said force properly. You don't actually know anything else about me, why would I hold any stock in the opinions of ideological internet strangers who just want to insult people they disagree with?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nope, that is in fact less detailed and even shorter than before. There's no fantasising about how cool you'd be if you took the fire down, and how manly it'd make you feel. That'd make it more in line.

I have said nothing about any "training". You're fighting your imagination.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"I don't think I'll have much trauma from putting out the fire, especially in my own home. Frankly, I'm just as likely to have trauma from having the fire in the first place than from dealing with the situation."

Lmao you are ridiculous. "Fantasizing about how cool I'd be and how manly it'd make me feel" where? The only one fantasizing here is you, pretending you know anything about me, or anything else for that matter.

I thought you were referring to the part where I said "you want to get medically significant hits to stop the threat as quick as possible," which were that the case would mean you did say something about that very training, but if not tbh this is on you for not being specific at all. I'm fighting vagueness lmao.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not being vague whatsoever. You're just playing dumb. Or are actually dumb. Hard to tell.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see you have given up trying to make a point.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Same to you. You have been vague. Either quote the specific lines or I'm done here.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Here:

Probably not, if they’re living in the attic they are still a threat, but likely not an economically sound threat. I probably have the advantage in that regard, they’d need like 7k in gear and some training to be better prepared. They’ll also never have access to the safe, nor the one on me, they’ll have to bring their own.

If they’re just in there hiding Richard Ramirez style, then it doesn’t matter who is better armed, it is time to roll them dice. Frankly it’s always a dice roll, I’ve seen a literal parishioner with a handgun take out a better armed dude with a 45yd (estimate) shot because the better armed mass shooter wasn’t as good of a shot and hadn’t learned his weapon properly (thankfully). What you carry matters less than getting shots on medically significant parts of your target quickly, you want to hit first and hit an area that is important, regardless of caliber, you could beat a guy with a .50cal with a .22lr, if he misses and you don’t. Of course, that said, you have a higher liklihood of one of those bullets hitting a medically significant target the bigger it is and the wound channels will be different, and depending on armor which the guy in the attic likely has none of you may need the small fast bois to punch through it, but I’d take my chances.

The real issue is he has the high ground and a choke point, so if he did bring a gun that’d present the most problems. Of course, he’s gotta come out sometime, and then it becomes my choke point. I suppose the real question becomes how did I discover he was there? Did I see him? Hear him banging around? Were the bangs as such that I’d go investigate myself or would I potentially involve law enforcement? All that makes a difference in the scenario. If I walk into my attic and theres just a guy up there who has the drop on me that is a kobayashi maru, but if I go up and he has a contact weapon like a bat or knife, I have the distance advantage. If I hear him up there and know it is a person somehow not just like a mouse, the cops are just getting called, I’ll outsource. If I hear him and think it may be a mouse and I go to investigate, we’re back to “does he have the drop on me or do I have the distance advantage.”

Still, in any case, the guy will be easier to deal with than the roaches. Less time, less money, and maybe he has a gun but maybe not and maybe it doesn’t matter if he does.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here:

Probably not, if it starts in the toaster oven it are still a threat, but likely not an economically sound threat. I probably have the advantage in that regard, I have a fore extinguisher and a smoke detector so I'm better prepared. It'll also never start in the fire extinguisher, it'll have to bring its own.

If it's just in there burning Richard Ramirez style, then it doesn’t matter who has more fire extinguishers, it is time to roll them dice. Frankly it’s always a dice roll, I’ve seen a literal parishioner with an extinguisher take out a fairly big fire with a 30ft (estimate) squirt because the fire wasn’t too big yet, (nor was the fire as good of a shot and hadn’t learned his extinguisher properly, thankfully). What you carry matters less than getting shots on significant parts of your fire quickly, you want to hit first and hit an area that is important, regardless of fire, you could beat a fire with a class d or with a class b, if the fire is an appropriate type. Of course, that said, you have a higher liklihood of one of those squirts hitting a significant target the bigger the hose is and the squirt channels will be different, and depending on armor which the fire in the toaster oven likely has none of you may need the squirty bois to punch through it, but I’d take my chances.

The real issue is he has the initiative, that’d present the most problems. Of course, he’s get put out sometime. I suppose the real question becomes how did I discover the fire was there? Did I see it? Hear the fire alarm banging around? Were the flames as such that I’d go fight it myself or would I potentially involve fire department? All that makes a difference in the scenario. If I walk into my kitchen and there's just a fire up there who has the drop on me that bad, but if I go up and he has a contact weapon like a fire or fire, I have the distance advantage with the extinguisher. If I hear it up there and know it is a big fire somehow not just like a mouse, the firemen are just getting called, I’ll outsource. If I hear him and think it may be a small fire and I go to investigate, we’re back to “does he have the drop on me or do I have the distance advantage.”

Still, in any case, the fire will be easier to deal with than the fire. Less time, less money, and maybe he has a fire but maybe not and maybe it doesn’t matter if he does.

How's that, sport?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No usually you can't just refresh a fire, you need the extinguisher.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Mate. You know I'm talking about find and replace. Just replacing words does not make an equivalent - it's just an edited clone.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Alright I'll punch this up when I can, easily. Woke up to the flu today though so you're on the back burner.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You'd be the one shot. They're armed and ready to attack. You're naked walking through a hallway.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But we FOUND them in the attic, so we can’t be naked in a hallway. I’m certainly not going into my attic naked.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You and I have very different attics

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Based and naked-in-the-attic-pilled

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you wear your holster in the shower?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

You don't have a shower glock?