this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
156 points (95.9% liked)

Antiwork

8297 readers
21 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kamills@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can't the stone be cut and handled without generating airborn dust?

[–] Mitchie151@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some locations in Australia already had controls in place, such as requiring integrated water delivery systems and on tool dust extraction. PPE was a legal requirement on top of that. With all that it must have been decided it was still too dangerous, so I support the decision.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

In another post about the same one of the comments was that despite the regulations workplace safety was bullshit and more people got sick. So the authorities decided it's simpler to ban the thing altogether than to try to force everyone to comply to the regulations.

Not sure if that's a good decision but it seems like the one with less casualties

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Airfed masks with the correct filter is perfectly fine. Combined with water suppression on the Stone cutting machine.

Decent ones can be pricey at about £700 each but that's cheaper than someone getting silicosis.

[–] kamills@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's what I figured. Sounds like they have a hard time enforcing and checking people get the correct PPE.

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah my company offers "Wear your PPE or hand in your notice" mentality