149
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Condoning genocide and telling us we are doing great when we can see we are not might be impacting those numbers. He needs to drop out. And Dems refusing to demand their party offer up someone else are complicit when trump gets reelected

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

I don't particularly like him either, but if he doesn't run again, it becomes significantly easier for Trump to get reelected. Pick your poison. I'd rather Biden than Trump, so I want him to stay running and I'll vote for him again.

Maybe you should vote for a write-in candidate if you feel that strongly about it? Just know that whatever you write, it will spell "Trump."

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

I don’t think Biden should drop out.

I also don’t think Biden should be the automatic nominee. There should be a full primary election, and whoever wins that (maybe Biden, maybe someone else) goes to the general.

Biden has done a bunch of good stuff, but he’s also woefully out of touch on an absolute FUCKTON of issues that non-boomer voters give a whole hell of a lot of shits about. I am so fucking done with gerontocracy.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

but if he doesn’t run again, it becomes significantly easier for Trump to get reelected.

Biden disagrees...

He just said a week or so ago that "at least 50 other Dems" could beat trump.

The polls disagree too, they show that Biden doesn't have a very good chance against trump.

We ignored those polls in 2016 to run an unpopular candidate, and trump was elected.

[-] cowfodder@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

The polls in 2016 showed Clinton beating Trump.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

For popular vote nationwide...

State polls for battleground states was very concerning with a lot Dems took for granted had results for Clinton but margain of error showed a trump win possible.

That's where Republicans focused effort, while Clinton was going to states like Cali on her preemptive victory lap

The thing was, pointing that out before the election got shouted down by moderates and you would be accused of wanting her to lose.

Pretty much what's happening now with 2024...

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

The only polls that favored Hillary were ones that only polled her established demographic. NONE of them included the 18-34yo demographic, and heavily leaned female polling

[-] nocturne213@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

An unpopular candidate that won the popular vote in 2016?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

She was so politically inept that she didn't take the electoral college into account. This is what happens when party leadership decides the winner before the primaries. They nominate someone who runs a coronation parade instead of a campaign.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

After boosting trump in the primary because she thought he was her easiest opponent...

She was willing to risk trump winning because it was her best chance to be president.

But even that wasn't enough to get her in office due to her campaign team not understanding what the electoral college is and instead campaigning for the popular vote...

Which pretty much sums up why she's so unpopular. She gambled with America and lost because she wanted to be able to say she got more votes than Obama.

Again, that's something that would have happened organically because of constant population increase.

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

She was the favorite of the superdelegates/party darlings as well. Also she by far isn't the only Democrat who helps the insane GOP candidates, that's like a common strategy to give money to the insane fascist, a bunch of Dem campaigns do this.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

A generic Democratic Perry cannidate would be a safer choice. Draft a blue state governor or something

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Why don't democrats run somebody better than Biden without all the baggage?

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

For the same reasons I just cited.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Democrats running Biden would be the best thing for a Trump campaign.

They've already lost the republican vote. The best thing they can do is try to gain the independent one.

[-] joenforcer@midwest.social 0 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
149 points (88.2% liked)

politics

18874 readers
3721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS