26
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
26 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22745 readers
314 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
That’s not wrong, but I truly think if faced with zombies that solidarity with the living is a top priority.
are they dead though? Like they're still animated, they're still able to walk, talk, eat (sleep?).
Zombies deserve rights too.
yes of course if there were a real life real undead apocalypse or whatever sure go help your neighbours and form a militia, but that's not going to happen. We already have the undead, the dehumanised, the poor and the hungry and homeless. Only during their revolt will we be forced to look at them
I know this sounds dickish, but it really depends on definitions. Their reproduction method alone raises some fascinating questions about the nature of life.
nah that's vampires, totally different set of fears and stereotypes there.
Zombies are the people tbh, manifested as an inevitable, inescapable, and most of all visible act of rebellion and recognition.
Idk, we're talking fantasy here so it's all for naught, but I'm siding with the zombies ngl
So what you are getting at is the horror movie thing where the “monster” represents a social fear, and the zombie represents the social fear of the masses and their power? That’s cool af tbh