this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
327 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3988 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not obligated to perform abortions under a longstanding national emergency-care law, dealing a blow to the White House's strategy to ensure access to the procedure after the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I wonder what it would cost to secretly buy up faux news and maybe OAN and the start pushing “subversive” material. (The truth is subversive, yes?)

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It would probably be easier to just make a new one. Have a few articles slamming dems, but then secretly push left wing politics in a “conservative” voice.

“Biden doesn’t have to balls to pass the Freedom Health Care Act” (which will secretly be socialized health care).

They’re so dumb they’ll believe anything of it comes from an obese red faced man yelling. Just slip “and our guns?!!!” In every so often.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would disagree but when Fox was whining about what AOC believed in and put it on a bulleted list it was as much an eye opener as you can get into the thinking of a conservative. Specifically that they can say "caring for seniors" is a bad thing with a straight face knowing nobody would question them.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

BUT MUH GUNZZZ

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

hah. exactly. Though, honestly... OAN and Faux news has name recognition. it's hard to take the views from them, or to build up such a network. Remember. Fox was purposes built to sell propaganda since '96(?). we don't have that kind of time

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Well, you’re right that we don’t have that kind of time. The effort would have to be very organized, and it would cost a lot of money. I doubt that kind of funding could be raised knowing it was a farce without the truth getting out.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not for sale. They're ideological organizations. At best you'd need a decades long con to even float the idea.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

everybody has a price. The more... noble... people, that price might not be cash. but every one has a price.

Murdochs? yeah, they'll sell if it's high enough. They'll even keep it quiet if it's high enough.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

I doubt that with these people. When you have the kinds of money these people do it's not about more money but more power. Quite literally controlling how a not insignificant portion of the "western world" views the world is absolutely invaluable.