this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35772 readers
553 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As far as I know, the big damage from Nuclear Weapons planetside is the massive blastwave that can pretty much scour the earth, with radiation and thermal damage bringing up the rear.

But in space there is no atmosphere to create a huge concussive and scouring blast wave, which means a nuclear weapon would have to rely on its all-directional thermal and radiation to do damage.. but is that enough to actually be usful as a weapon in space, considering ships in space would be designed to handle radiation and extreme thermals due to the lack of any insulative atmosphere?

I know a lot of this might be supposition based on imaginary future tech and assumptions made about materials science and starship creation, but surely at least some rough guess could be made with regards to a thernonuclear detonation without the focusing effects of an atmosphere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 199 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

From a NASA paper on this very subject:

If a nuclear weapon is exploded in a vacuum-i. e., in space-the complexion of weapon effects changes drastically:

First, in the absence of an atmosphere, blast disappears completely.

Second, thermal radiation, as usually defined, also disappears. There is no longer any air for the blast wave to heat and much higher frequency radiation is emitted from the weapon itself.

Third, in the absence of the atmosphere, nuclear radiation will suffer no physical attenuation and the only degradation in intensity will arise from reduction with distance. As a result the range of significant dosages will be many times greater than is the case at sea level.

Sounds like you'd end up with just a big blast of radiation

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 95 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I spent 20 minutes searching for an answer to this, and all my searches turned up nothing but video games and short stories.

Appreciate you posting that, and honestly a little frustrated on why that didnt come up for me.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 71 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Web search has gotten so bad, I hate it

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

SEO is a plague on us all.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I've completely switched over to using ChatGPT as my basic question search engine now. Like I get that it's confidently wrong at times and I wouldn't go there for legal advice but for silly curiosities I've got a better chance at finding an answer to satisfy my query.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I beta tested Bard and have used ChatGPT and the number of times they responded with completely wrong answers was stunning. Confidently wrong is a greatvway to put it.

I switched to DuckDuckGo a few years back and it's been better than Google for a bit. At this rate, I expect Encyclopedia Britannica to make a strong comeback.

[–] AmidFuror@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if you can't afford the whole encyclopedia set and can only buy the sample volume?

And speaking of volcanoes, man are they a violent igneous rock formation!

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Jokes aside, the future of paywalled curated knowledge is already here. With the current assault on public libraries, I expect that fairly soon, knowledge will once again be a privileged of wealth.

[–] shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Perplexity is much better imo

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago

I've had good luck with that and using GPT4. Both have their strengths. They're both great at tldr-ing, If you prompt well.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

For the fun fact, shockwave do propagate in the interstellarmedium. Most likely a conventionnal nuke isn't big enough, but we can see the shockwave from supernova explosion, and voyager did measure the moment it left the sun one.

Radiation may be another beast with a well designed bomb, it's pretty hard to stop neutrons, and they do a lot of biological damage. However, radiation poisoning isn't an instant dead. Like shoot a nuke, leave. Come back 2 weeks latter and everyone is dying. Radiation could definitely damage electronic but I would assume spaceship designer worked properly, and the humam will be poisonned before the electronic starts to fail. A note though. The 1/r^2 law would still apply and space is huge. Being 1km out of the explosion divides the dose by 100 compared to being 100m away. 10 km away would divide the dose by 10 000. So the death radius won't be that big.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Okay, but now we're comparing nukes and supernovae, and that's kind of like comparing the erosion of a drop of water to that caused by a tsunami. Sure, the same forces may be at work, but they're small enough to be negligible in one.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

With a heavy dose of radiation you are sick extremely fast, and dead soon after. You may survive for some hours if you have medical care.

If the bomb explode next to the ship, the ship will need solid protection for people to survive.

[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Follow up question. If I build a giant vacuum chamber on earth and ignited a nuke in the middle of it, what would happen to the blast?

Would the chamber just explode with the full power of the nuke or would it remain unharmed (save for debris of the nuke itself)?

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

All the radiation that normally heats up the surrounding air into a giant fireball would heat up the walls of your vacuum chamber into a giant fireball.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

save for debris of the nuke itself

this is vapor fyi. the nuke and whatever was immediately around it are atomized, literally.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's plasma, not gas. It's a different state of matter.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bouh@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

It's still matter, with a mass and a velocity, and thus kinetic energy.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What about the EMP component of it?

[–] General_Shenanigans@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The massive EMPs that blasted the Pacific back in the day were generated with upper-atmospheric testing. The way it interacted with the upper atmosphere was special. If you set off the charge higher in space with no atmosphere, the EMP effect is lessened.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

the EMP effect is lessened.

on the ground. without a medium to dissipate the pulse, it still carries a tremendous amount of risk.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

Yeah that's my biggest note - radiation is a threat to people long term, but EMP destroying their spacecraft's computers are the larger threat at longer range. ISS and other spacecraft routinely harden many systems for the increased radiation present outside the magnetosphere, but this kind of attack could easily overload those protections. Honestly this aspect terrifies me because it only takes a few EMP blasts in LEO to start a kessler syndrome situation of debris and dead orbital vehicles whizzing around at orbital speeds. That's how we 'lose' space.

the EMP effect is lessened.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

That's one type of radiation it releases.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's because it detonated in orbit, so it interacted with Earth magnetic field. Far from the planet, I think there wouldn't be an EMP, unless the targeted ship has it's own magnetosphere. But I'm not a nuclear physicist, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If I'm not mistaken the EMP wave is really just a part of the high intensity wave of photons of various frequencies emitted by the explosion, which also includes the so-called "bright flash".

Some of those photons will have wavelengths that put them in the radio part of the spectrum so they can transverse materials which are not transparent to visible light frequency photons and have the right wavelengths to induce strong electrical currents in electronic circuits and even integrated circuits (which is what burns them) - depending on the length of a conductive line of material there often is a perfect radiowave wavelength to induce a current in it (though I confess that over the years I forgot the formulas to calculate this stuff)

I'm not a Nuclear Physicist but I have 1 year of University level Physics training and an EE degree (though focused on digital systems rather than telecomms).

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the explanation, I learned something new today.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

scratch all this if the missile explodes right in the middle of your bridge

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's true in a vacuum, but a weapon would presumably detonate on the surface or inside of a hostile ship, in which case the ship goes bye-bye.

[–] Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 10 months ago

So, that's how we get the fantastic four