this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
50 points (87.9% liked)

RPGMemes

10410 readers
537 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No, I don't care that 'it's more book keeping'; when 5e has kineticists, then we can talk.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, yeah, I guess its not the point, but as your article notes among all the things it isn't intended to do, it has the same effect. It's still what limits the effects of choices, rather than the number of them.

[โ€“] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago

It limits some choices. It limits things that give you a bonus to your d20 roll. There's nothing about it that prevents other vertical growth or any horizontal growth.

You could give players a special feat every level, for example, chosen from stuff that's like "Roll deception vs their passive wisdom. If you succeed, their dexterity becomes the lower of 8 and the current value, and they are vulnerable to sneak attack."

Nothing about bounded accuracy prevents that. The fact that you don't get to pick stuff like that very often is the limiting factor on making powerful, differentiated, characters.