this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
218 points (94.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35757 readers
464 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It is becoming near impossible to find relevant information from search engines. Duckduckgo, SearXNG, Bing, Google, and so many more mainstream engines have a significantly high noise to signal ratio, and it is getting worse.

Here are a collection of the best search engines I know, please add more to the list.

If no more high quality search engines exist, would it be possible to host your own?

EDIT: Some new discoveries. The addon uBlacklist and filters can block super SEO sites from appearing in search.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kd45@lemm.ee 41 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Many people keep asserting that DuckDuckGo is as useless as Google, but I haven’t had a single issue with it. Could it be a regional thing?

[–] drahardja@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

DDG is ok for most searches, but they have definitely hit a plateau. Programming search results are quite poor, for instance.

I’ve started paying for kagi. Their results are just way better at this point.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 10 points 9 months ago

I don't live in the US and the regional results for my country are worse on DuckDuckGo than on Google.

But still, I noticed Google's quality drastically falling down in recent years.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is as useless. After all, it's just Bing. But if the results are good enough for you, then why bother finding something else.

[–] Cinner@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

most are. just do a side by side comparison. for most queries it's literally the same results.

[–] cll7793@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, I did notice a sudden severe drop in quality recently. Perhaps they are A/B testing something.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

ddg has been going downhill for awhile now. they changed something significant a couple years back that just made results, especially after the first half-page, absolute shit.

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I think it was because they dropped Yandex results.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Ddg cannot filter out results. If you don't want pages containing the term, term you add -term to your search and those results should not be included.

Ddg doesn't do this. I did a brief test of many search engines, and only google and mojeek filtered results correctly.

Edit: yadex seems to have working filtering.

[–] amio@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago

Google doesn't do that properly anymore, either, much like the "literal search" (quotes) - used to work, now it's a crap shoot.

[–] overcast5348@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

It's not as bad as Google yet, but I find myself getting terrible or no results quite a few times.

Ex: if I'm looking for a niche blog post from example.com, just entering the keywords doesn't return the right result, if anything at all. I have to add "site:example.com" and the right link shows up on top.

It's kinda amusing when this happens, but I keep using ddg anyway because bing and Google had the same issue for the same keywords when I ran into the issue.