this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
920 points (93.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26995 readers
1351 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People keep talking about "Federalizing the National Guard" and now you've got other States pledging their NG to Texas in defiance of the Supreme Court (see image).

So is this what CW2 looks like?

P.S. I'm a Brit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You're wrong though. The general public is more likely to engage in civil unrest when they're struggling. The reality though is that while many Americans might be living paycheck to paycheck, they're not poor and not struggling. They are just bad at managing their finances and they have a lot to lose.

If you have more to lose than to gain, you won't participate in a civil war. But when you're a slave working in a cotton field, you have nothing to lose, only something to gain.

The idea that your average American is so poor is just laughable.

[–] tastysnacks@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm just imagining the sales of golf carts or those scooters going through the roof because Americans cant run a couple of miles during a civil war.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ahaha! That's a good one!

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Bad at managing their finances

Either you're being purposefully deceitful, or you have a horrible understanding of macroeconomics. But please, let's just continue to ignore the elephants named record-inflation, rent records and housing crisis in the room.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

There is a term for this called the "Valley of revolt" basically a people need enough empowerment to revolt but not enough to feel heard.

Also it's not necessarily just "bad with finances" it's that our expected standard of living doesn't match our actual standard of living. Rising cost and stagnant wages and all that.

[–] iquanyin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

over half a million live on the streets. flat out homeless. and then, the working poor, which you are if you live paycheck to paycheck. also, if you can’t live unless you work, you’re the working class.