this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22775 readers
373 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm curious to creck some of the new stuff out but it all looks so not Star Trek

By New Trek I mean Discovery, Picard, Strange New World and Lower Decks

Wow that's a lot of series.

I like the optimism of Star Trek and apparently a lot of New Trek kind of abandons that? sadness

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The "Burn" is honest to god the worst piece of lore in Trek history, probably in major science fiction history

Just a complete inability to appreciate the scale, continuity, and coherence of a setting, it's like it was made by someone who doesn't like Star Trek and is annoyed other people like it, so decided to burn and salt the setting for the sack of a half-baked climate change analogy

At least they had the decency to chuck it a 1000 years ahead of the main setting's timeframe

[โ€“] axont@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah that's about how I felt. It's like someone hated Star Trek's rosy optimism and wanted to destroy it. "What if your spaceship show about a brighter future was actually bad and everyone died in a big explosion." Completely missing the point of the show and the setting.