this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
361 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

34842 readers
33 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea that we are entering an era of techno-feudalism that will be worse than capitalism is chilling and controversial. We asked former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis to elucidate this idea, explain how we got here, and map out some alternatives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah sure… it worked great for Chile. Unless there is a wave of democratic socialism all over the western world, specially the US, all at the same time, it’ll just be squashed by fascism backed by the US and friends.

The only real solution that has worked before is a communist revolution. Like it or not.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only real solution that has worked before is a communist revolution.

You have an interesting concept of something "working".

The actual solution that worked before is trust busting and Keynesian economic policy.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is your definition of working? I’d say communist revolutions have indeed worked. I base that on data, facts and the material conditions of places that had a revolution compared to countries in similar economic and geopolitical situations.

Cuba is doing much better than most Latin American countries. In most areas it’s doing MUCH better.

China is doing infinitely better than any other comparable country, like India. It’s not even a comparison.

The USSR was also doing much better than any country in a comparable situation when it did exist.

How did these revolutions “not work”?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Cuba is doing much better than most Latin American countries. In most areas it’s doing MUCH better.

I was just in Cuba last year. A doctor makes $35 per month. The cab to the airport cost almost that much. A cab drive makes more than a doctor's monthly salary from two fares. Their money is ridiculously screwed up. The official exchange rate is something around 24 CUP to the dollar. But at the airport it's like 1/3 that value. And in the black market it's 1/6 that value. People live in poverty while the government buildings are immaculate marvels. The people I talked with there know how messed up the country is.

China is doing infinitely better than any other comparable country, like India.

You mean the country where capitalism is thriving and labour unions are illegal? Where billionaires dominate the ruling party? China is communist in name only.

The USSR was also doing much better than any country in a comparable situation when it did exist.

It was doing great... until it collapsed? Great success story!

Sorry but whatever you're reading isn't very accurate.