this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
846 points (97.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

29786 readers
462 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We need a Google successor.

Something non-profit.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The horrible reality is that Bing has actually become a competitor to Google, simply by Google getting worse and worse. Microsoft used to be the main bad guy, but these days they practically seem benign compared to the others. Not open source like you're saying, of course.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ai generated top reply on Bing pisses me off 90% of the time. Word salad with citations.

Often citations for fake books or rare print material the AI couldn't possibly have had access to. ~Cherri

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The infrastructure to crawl, store, and serve search results to billions of users is phenomenally expensive. A government might fund it (which comes with its own concerns), but a non-profit will struggle to compete.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would pay a subscription if it were truly non profit and had no ads.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Federated search is possible but has not gotten a lot of attention yet.

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're talking about YaCY, apparently that's pretty much useless right now from what I've heard. ~Cherri

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's actually a lot of theory and early work out there on the topic of federated search. While existing search aggregators like Searx and YaCY certainly qualify as federated, search infrastructure built from the ground up with decentralization in mind would look very different.

[–] 33KK@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

When you factor out all the garbage content it's suddebly affordable lol

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia probably has the resources to do it, wikisearch. Somebody talk them into it. But yeah, modern search engines, pretty amazing the ones from two decades ago actually worked better.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This could be interesting. The infrastructure required to scrape the internet though is going to be so daunting. Google got to build it up slowly as the internet got bigger. Bing is backed by a huge corporation that already has data centers. A new non profit player is going to take a huge coordinated effort.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know P2P had become a dead buzzword, but what if people dedicated a portion of their computers to assisting an open search engine.

I would wait 30s for accurate results. It could also piggyback on a search aggregator.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There used to be an open source search aggregator, don't remember what it was called

[–] ArcticCircleSystem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it was YaCY, but apparently it's basically useless for everyday use. ~Cherri

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that looks like it! Why do you say it is useless? I have cloud credits that I could theoretically burn hosting one of these

IIRC its results just aren't that good? I haven't tried it, this is just what I've heard. Maybe it's gotten better? ~Cherri

[–] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm.. Interesting.. That would be great.. If only something like that exists now!

[–] SJ0@lemmy.fbxl.net 6 points 1 year ago

Yacy exists but it's bad enough that it's one of the few options I don't self host.