340
submitted 8 months ago by LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 66 points 8 months ago

Here's how the NYT describes it. "Many" is doing a lot of evil heavy lifting.

archive.today • In Chaotic Gaza Scene, Many Killed and Wounded as Israeli Forces Open Fire - The New York Times

The Palestinian news agency reported that Israeli tanks had fired at thousands waiting for aid. Israeli officials said Gazans were trampled and run over by aid trucks.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 52 points 8 months ago

Lol the MSM is incapable of mentioning Palestinians in a massacre in the same sentence. It’s one or the other.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Even NYT couldn't do their signature "Palestinians die mysteriously for no apparent reason" entirely this time

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 34 points 8 months ago

They still managed their passive voices in the headline though.

[-] SoyViking@hexbear.net 34 points 8 months ago

MSM where I live are reporting the controversy, ie. "Palestine says Massacre, 'Israel' says tragedy" and sprinkling it heavily with the usual "Hamas-controlled health authorities" and such. They have some decent stuff inside the articles, like saying that Gazan health authority numbers are usually correct, but if you just read headlines you could easily think it was all just a bunch of accusations.

[-] sir_this_is_a_wendys@hexbear.net 34 points 8 months ago

It's on purpose. They know most people only read the headlines. MSM is just blatant Israeli war propaganda.

[-] Moonworm@hexbear.net 19 points 8 months ago

Writers also don't typically get to pick their own headlines.

[-] very_poggers_gay@hexbear.net 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The Guardian's (now edited) headline was: "Middle East crisis live: Hamas warns it could end hostage talks after more than 100 Palestinians killed near aid trucks"

Because when israel slaughters hundreds of Palestinians they are intentionally starving, journalistic integrity requires that you obscure who did the killing or why thousands of Palestinans were so desperate for aid. The readers need to know that what's important is how Hamas(!!!) might react, of course, with the implication that Hamas would no longer be receptive to a hostage deal (even though the deals they've offered to israel have always been rejected).

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago

"Consciousness ceded in a dynamically calorie restricted situation"

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

tragedy

It's wild how the media uses a word like that in at least three different ways. The Gaza war really brings this out to an insane degree.

  • It's used in a biased way to show the bararity of Hamas and the damage (or "scars" - figurative of course) inflicted on Israel. "On October 7, 2023, a day forever etched in the collective memory of Israel, an unspeakable tragedy unfolded, leaving a deep scar on the nation..."

  • It can be used in a neutral way.

  • It can be used to mean an unfortunate oopsie was made by Israel and they are so sorry about it.

 

I got the idea for this comment from this quote.

People uttered so, in a slight flatting of tone, means white people. Uttered another way, it means black. A third way means people in general.

- "Love in the Ruins (1971)" by Walker Percy

[-] Rom@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago

WaPo right now:

Chaotic aid delivery turns deadly as Israeli, Gazan officials trade blame

Whoops no idea how that happened, each side blames the other, who's to know the truth??????

this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
340 points (100.0% liked)

news

23523 readers
664 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS