this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
213 points (96.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12273 readers
1376 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago (4 children)
[–] radix@lemmy.world 57 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because that's the way they've done it since 1987, and the CEO doesn't like change.

[–] wolfkin@mastodon.social 36 points 8 months ago

@radix @gregorum I can just FEEL how super useful that was many many years ago. How utterly brilliant everyone felt when they got it working. How depressed they must feel to know it's still going.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Not OP, but if I had to hazard a guess, it started as a rudimentary issue tracker and grew into a formalized system over time, maybe? I've worked with many a project manager who "knew Excel" and liked to use it for things it should never be used for, and sometimes PMs get promoted and take their dumb little systems up the org chart with them.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Bypassing communication archiving requirements? Years ago, I worked for a company that logged all IM, etc, that occurred in a companies intranet. There were laws that required all communications to be preserved for certain industries.

This sounds like a workaround to avoid chat history

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Generally bypassing these auditing requirements is a punishable offense. I worked for a firm that was SEC regulated and you might be shocked at how much effort was expended on ensuring these policies weren’t being circumvented.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

"We cracked the case open when we discovered their chats in 'troubleshooting_not_secret_comms.xls'. They tried to cover their tracks through regular deletion, and they would have gotten away with it if not for one neglected PC in a disused office running an unsupervised copy of Norton Backup 1990."

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

I genuinely don’t know. I was as flabbergasted as you are.