this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22767 readers
408 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
you will take the depression scotty episode from my cold dead hands
I agree that nostalgia baiting is bad and keeps the show from growing, but I'm sure we can all agree that it accelerated over time. One episode with a TOS crewmember didn't keep TNG from inventing the Borg and so on.
Agreed, I'm not seeing the problem with the older, cozier series that get to breathe with 24 monster of the week episodes having some fun nostalgia peppered in. They don't rely on it. And, as someone who is totally enamored with Nana Visitor, Michelle Forbes is the same caliber actor and it's hard to imagine the series being worse(just different) just because they used an established character.
Nutrek is built on nostalgia bait and subverting that nostalgia for cheap shallow cuts and boring grim prestige TV tropes. As someone pointed out elsewhere with the Boimler quote, Nutrek forgot the Trek mantra, and is "boldly going" nowhere.
The cringe part was the Dyson Sphere. I don't really think they understand how big I would be. Also a really interesting plot device to then throw away after the first act.
I so can't get over it. WHO THE HELL LIVED IN THERE?!!? (no I will not consume the expanded universe to find out).