For context, it was about the recent Vaxerski incident, where I shared my personal opinion about the whole gender stuff. I wasn't even trying to be hurtful against anyone, just shared my 2 cents in an already ongoing conversation.

Sure, ine might not agree with my opinion, and I don't agree with others, and this is totally normal. But at least we should be able to have sane and respectful conversations where no one is insulting each other, or anyone else... without having a mod intervening into the conversation

So to all the mods out there: Your personal opinion does not give you the right to delete comments and block users, just because their opinions don't align with yours!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] ad_on_is@programming.dev -10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

ok, then what about the 16th century, 5th, 2nd, 100 B.C, 200 B.C?

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, homosexuality and non-gender conforming individuals have existed throughout human history and across all cultures with varying social attitudes toward them. You know, you're quite opinionated for someone with no demonstrable understanding of the topic, but I suppose that explains a lot.

[–] ad_on_is@programming.dev -4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're talking as if transgenderism and homosexuality (and their problems) emerged in the 19th century. That's why I asked you about the other centuries?

Pederasty was a socially acceptable thing back in 600 b.c amongst the Etruscans, for example.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I neither said nor implied any such thing. You brought up books written in the 1800s which is why my initial reply specifically focused on the 19th century. You're either dumb or you're here in bad faith, but based on your last sentence, being a weak attempt to shift the conversation from LGBTQ and non-binary people to pederasts, which is straight out of the right-wing playbook, it's safe to assume the latter. So we're done here.

[–] ad_on_is@programming.dev -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

lol, right-wing playbook... dude, I'm anything but right-wing

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Man. I really wanted to support you, but you're making it very difficult.

You're offended by an accusation of being right-wing instead of listening to what they (the person) haslve to say. In turn, you just linked gay people to pedophiles - perhaps unintentionally, but damn, man. That's actually bigot talk. Now, I'm not saying you are. But again, take a step back and reflect in how you approach these themes. Otherwise you'll be making more harm than good.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This wiki page, not itself as an original source but as a collection of original papers in the references for you to peruse at your leisure is a great starting point. But your question is a bit like the “Did you know Aristotle never said ‘Thank You’? Mostly because he didn’t speak English.” Joke. You are expecting modern accommodations and language in texts from a different era that would have used unfamiliar forms or language like ancient Egypt that had a 3rd gender “sekhet”.