this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
96 points (94.4% liked)

World News

2306 readers
92 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SadArtemis@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Personally I think the west is going to try all the same. And it'll go about as terribly as can be expected, especially with Russia returning to its anti-colonial legacy.

It can be delayed, and perhaps (depending on circumstance) should be, but IMO the imperialists will not go out without trying to take the world down with them. It's not in their nature, the nature of their ideologies, institutions, etc.

[–] halfpipe@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago

It's going to try, but it's not 1992 anymore, there are other centers of power and financing in the world.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's my biggest worry as well, these people are very much starting a nuclear holocaust once they realize their time as the hegemon is over.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they have seen anything over the event horizon either. They can't make legitimate strategy that involves nuclear annihilation. The risk comes from the fanatics they are cultivating.

The solution will be the same thing that will prevent the USA from being successful in large scale invasion, domestic rebellion. There will not be enough soldiers to fight, there are people who will fight the fanatics to stop a launch. It's tenuous, but it's what's going to happen and when you consider the circumstances, it's the only way it can happen. The empire has to eat itself.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago

US sliding into civil unrest before it's able to start a world war is a very plausible scenario.