this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
910 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60058 readers
1739 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube first spoke about pause ads last year when it started trialing them in select regions. At the time, the company said that when you pause a video, it will shrink, and an ad will appear next to it.

Example:

“In Q1, we saw strong traction from the introduction of a pause ads pilot on connected TVs, a new non-interruptive ad format that appears when users pause their organic content,” Schindler noted. He went on to share that YouTube’s pause ads are “driving strong brand lift results” and “are commanding premium pricing from advertisers.”

Schindler didn’t share any timelines for when pause ads will start appearing on YouTube, but we know they’ll first roll out on smart TVs. The nature of these ads, including their duration, skippability, and more is still unclear. We also don’t know if Google plans to introduce these ads on YouTube’s mobile apps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (5 children)

While I share your sentiment, they've got a backdoor for exactly that scenario: Youtube Premium. We are addicted to the algorithm and a lot of us are willing to pay good money for their stream of dopamine. Of course Google will eventually mess up there too, but it could easily give them another decade of intense money milking.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Neither do I, but that's hardly the point. The house of cards you're describing is reinforced with concrete steel. Unless you're a creator with a massive audience, Youtube does not need you.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

That's some Yahoo logic. Even giants stumble and fall.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 8 months ago

I'd pay for a premium service if it meant that YouTube couldn't profile me. I don't really want to pay for it just so that they can reliably link financial data to the profile they build on me.

[–] PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I pay for the family bundle for YT Music. The ad free YT is just a bonus.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I pay for it. It gets rid of the ads when I need a video of how to do XYZ thing. It lets me watch channels that I care about without interruptions. The main thing for me though is when a friend or family member sends me a YouTube video, I don't have to watch ads.

It's weird to me that folks are so hostile towards paying for things they use on the Internet. I mean, I get that venture capital fueled a seemingly endless "free lunch" of new services with small amounts of advertising... but it had to end at some point. It costs a lot of money to run a "YouTube."

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

People are hostile towards it because Youtube generates enough revenue as is and becomes greedier by the day. People paying for it on top is only making things progressively worse. Free users will only get more and more ads shoved down their throat while premium users experience more and more price hikes. I‘m gonna keep blocking ads the traditional way for as long as I can because I do not see a fair alternative in the long run.

My comment wasn‘t about defending Youtube or anything. The truth is the service can become much worse and still be more profitable so that’s what Youtube is working towards like every other service. Enshittification is at full swing. Google makes more money while creators continue to lose revenue. Things are becoming worse. Just not exactly the way it was described in the previous comment.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

I use it all the time but I definitely don't use the "algorithm".