this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
215 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43893 readers
1095 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Except when it comes to Math. Math is absolute, as long as you ignore statistics.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

as long as you ignore statistics

See? Conditions

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Gotta ignore infinities too. The axioms they're based on are highly controversial.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

And ~~irrational~~ imaginary numbers. I mean the numbers make sense, but it’s not like we can intuitively understand sqrt(-1).

[–] kryptonite@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're thinking of imaginary numbers. Irrational numbers are real numbers that have an infinite number of decimal places and don't repeat.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 6 months ago

Lol. Yes. Don’t drink and Lemmy.

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Your example is a complex number. An irrational number would be Pi or sqrt(5)

[–] reinei@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Nah even statistics is perfectly logical and right, but not because truth is absolute (there may be such a thing, but we definitely don't have access to it in that case. [At this time?]), but rather because math defined there to be a way in which all you derive from it is 'absolutely' true. It just might be 'absolutely' true in a system that isn't ours, or isn't useful for answering anything we want to ask...