135
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
135 points (98.6% liked)
GenZedong
4242 readers
106 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Is "China Television" a specific channel or did the author mean to write Chinese Television? I'm too poor to read the article
Edit: The article is talking about the Zero Tolerance docuseries made by CGTN. idk what's up with the headline, is it improper to use adjectives in titles?
Try this: https://web.archive.org/web/20220302123649/https://www.wsj.com/articles/on-china-television-corrupt-officials-corporate-villains-are-bad-guys-11644069604
Thank you!! ๐
This is just a glorified plot synopsis. It belongs on a fan wiki not a news site. I think the author came up with a headline first and scrambled together the article later.
You're right I think. Right at the end there is some commentary, however it's more like when an article uses Twitter posts to pad out its content.