this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
263 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

32471 readers
267 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Would sponsorblock be a solution for this?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

With a little adoption yes it could. We could pass around checksums of known good blocks, or checksums of known advertisements. Or the audio signature of known good blocks or the audio signature of known advertisements.

So a service is like sponsor block would now just be a curated list of either good or bad signatures be them checksums or audio signatures or video signatures. There would be some engineering work to account for different compression ratios etc but it's totally doable

[–] illi@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

From what I read, this also breaks sponsorblock - as the ads are part of the video, it moves the time stamps of the video so it makes it not correct. The ads will also change I imagine so idk if sponsorblock will be a solution.

[–] jayknight@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So videos that reference timestamps in their own video won't work? And comments that reference a timestamp won't work?

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They could on the fly change them.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that need to be done via some kind of API for cross-platform compatibility? An API which could be exploited to detect ad segments?

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, they would just do that internally in their own code, why would they need an API for that?

[–] gila@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So that the timestamp adjustment can be propagated via uploader or user comments across YouTube clients on all platforms... i.e. to avoid having to hardcode each adjustment for each ad on each video on every client

[–] relevants@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago

Why couldn't they just serve the comments to each client with the ad-adjusted timestamps already? The only thing the client has to request then is the comment page it wants to load, and some unique ID for which the backend remembers which ad version it's associated with.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

No, not in it's actual form, nor the front-ends can't not longer cutting the ads with their current form. Or they change their script, or you have the alternative to use YT or using another streaming service. But I think that there will be other solution in the future to show the middle finger to YT.