this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
263 points (97.8% liked)

Privacy

32471 readers
345 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 113 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Looks like I'm testing not using YouTube.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 32 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, that'll be hard. I'm trying to use Peertube but network effect is big on YT (not sure if that's the right expression here, noone is using Peertube, everyone is on YT).

[–] lemmymarud@lemmy.marud.fr 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm sending my videos on my Peertube and Youtube. I send the link for Peertube a few days before Youtube, so people following me would have more interest on looking at it on PT earlier but the numbers can't be beaten : between 5 and 20 views on PT against 1K / 2K on Youtube.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lockhart@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

try odysee, some creators mirror their yt vids there

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I like Odysee, but there's a lot of right-wing bullshit on there that give me a major case of cringe.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It’s past due that we need a new platform.

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago

We don't need a new platform. We need 20 new platforms, and authors can post on whichever ones are best for them. Have real competition and real incentive to be better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0xtero@beehaw.org 9 points 6 months ago

Been using Nebula for a while now. Going to miss some YouTube creators, but I'll expect to get over it.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

That'll make youtube disappear for me.

Over the years I watched less and less. I only seldomly have to look into youtube for things that are easier in video than in text.

Teens and many people don't know that there is a world without ads. They have to be educated that there are alternatives - not watching youtube is a real option. You do not depend on it.

I's a horrible world many people live in. Recently I saw someone browsing on instagram, each third post is an ad and oftentimes there are ads after ads. And people follow other people and watch their ads. Incredible!

Recently, I was browsing linkedin and there were 12 ads instead of real jobs in a row. in a row. Unrelated to my profession.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But the point is there’s always been a way to avoid ads, even while browsing sites with ads and browsing YT. Personally, if that ability entirely disappears, i hate ads, ad-voice, and the concept of advertising so much that I will stop and close a whole tab if an ad plays. I’m in the minority though. Because, I think you’re right, a lot of people just don’t even think about it and mindlessly consume. I can’t. When Reddit fucked us and showed us our opinions and feelings didn’t matter, I left. I will do the same to YT.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think many people see it as normal/expected.

A coworker showed me a video yesterday on their phone, I said 'holy hell what is this shit? This is what it looks like for you?' And opened it in Tubular. They had no idea such a thing existed.

I rarely watch videos because I prefer to read. The people I work with spend a vast amount of their free time watching YouTube and TikTok. They just seem to zone out, or be really interested when an ad comes on.

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think many people see it as normal/expected.

Yes, that's it. People born in the early part of last century (my grandparent's era) only knew over-the-air TV which in the US included commercials. It was just part of reality, like billboards by the highway.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago

The county I live in banned billboards and most outdoor advertising long ago, and it’s NICE

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I know this is an unpopular opinion but I love YouTube and it really bums me out to have to drop it. My home account has been heavily curated over the past two decades and it's pretty rare to see a video on my homepage from the shitty part of YouTube...now I'm getting ads and just closing the tab. I have a separate account just for listening to music on my work laptop and I've found a ton of new artists through it, too....not sure what I'm gonna do once it starts getting ads, too.

I have a Nebula subscription but only like 1/3 of the channels I watch are on there. And obviously none of the music

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I feel the same way. Or felt. It is a wonderful platform that will let anyone upload and share videos at absolutely no cost. Video hosting isn't as expensive as we are often lead to believe, but it isn't cheap. Especially if you want to provide a great experience like different resolutions and qualities.

I used to subscribe to YouTube Premium and was quite happy about it. However they slowly made the platform worse and worse. At some point it hurt to give them money, even if the subscription was "worth it". I just didn't like giving money to people destroying a great platform.

Luckily YouTube still supports RSS. This means that I can easily mix in other video platforms with no bother. I now subscribe to Nebula and have 35 subscriptions there. I also have a handful of PeerTube, video podcasts and other self-hosted creators. It isn't the "majority" of my subscriptions (Apparently I have ~200 YouTube channels that I subscribe to, but a huge number of them are dead, second channels or incredibly infrequent.) but it doesn't matter. All of my subscriptions come to the same "inbox" and it doesn't really matter what platform they are on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

This is where we could use a browser plug in that uses AI to learn what an ad is and skip it for us. Now we just need someone to start working on it.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Plugins can add controls and it can download videos, but plugins can't interact with videos directly I think.

Maybe use the Youtube API closed captions and figure out the patterns for ads that way?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Turd_Ferg@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thats fine. This just fuels developers to make more efficient ad blockers. Youtube wont win the long game and the more they try stuff like this, the more people find out about ublock and other adblockers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KeefChief13@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Youtube is testing my fucking patience.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

For a lot of things I already had changed to alternative sites, the best alternative to YT IMHO is Odysee, music of all kind you can listen here 24/7, or in Bandcamp, for movies there is PlutoTV and the pages of the local public TV for free, news are in the homepage of the prefered newspaper, etc..

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Crap I just opened youtube today and it looks like I was chosen. The ads load like normal videos and it sucks. My brain actually glitched for a couple of seconds when I opened a video because I wasn't used to seeing an ad. I dunno if there's any chance uBO can even counter this.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Try to watch the video embedded, simply edit it's URL, using instead of

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxxxxxxx

this URL

https://www.youtube.com/embed/xxxxxxxx

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago

Welp, restarted my laptop and I'm off the testing list so can't replicate (unless I turn off uBO of course). But thanks, this will be handy if it happens again.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 months ago

Oh dear lord no.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 16 points 6 months ago

I'm surprised it took them this long.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

YT has 2 posibilities

  • Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user
  • Insert also markers which at the end also are exploited by adblockers and userscripts

I think they'll hit their teeth against a rock with this.

Meanwhile a lot of content creators a changing to Odysee

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's not true. The way their streaming works is basically a Playlist of shorter fragments. They can easily insert their own fragments without obvious visual tells if they don't alter other elements of the page to indicate that an ad is playing.

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But they will have to alter othet elements on the page. For example, scrubbing. It will either have to be paused at one specific timestamp while the ad is playing or the ad would have to be incorporated into the length of the video.

In either case, it is detectable.

The video chunks hash can be calculated and then blocked, in a crowdsourced way like with sponsorblock (but way more effective, because it will cover all videos)

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The obvious solution to me is sponsorblock switching to sampling pixels out of each frame, like that project that encoded data into video streams (yet resilient to compression), there are algorithms that could fingerprint any ad with an extremely high degree of accuracy. It'd be more complex than the current implementation, but it'd also be more resilient. I'd settle for it hiding the video and suppressing the audio for the ads duration, possibly displaying a countdown timer, vs actually watching the ad. Then Youtube would get paid, but have no way of knowing you haven't seen the ad, and the metrics around their ad effectiveness would ultimately suffer, so users still win.

You could even go so far as to have the client cache the video, several minutes in advance, dropping all the ad frames, so it's a seamless experience for the user. I got money, but will spend 10x as much ensuring Google gets less from me. It ain't about money. It's about sending a message!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • Hosting all videos doble, one with ads and the same vids without for premium user

Not quite sure why, they simply could in the fly stitch those files together.

Twitch is doing that for a while now i think.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Actually the videos get stitched together dynamically.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 months ago

I think they'll hit their teeth against a rock with this.

Press X to doubt

Most people do not have an adblocker. Most people watch YouTube to varying degrees of frequency and duration. Most people will continue to watch the ads. I’d be surprised if YT noticed any amount of users leaving the site because of this. The privacy minded folk are few and far between.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zeke@fedia.io 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I just pull videos from Youtube to watch later. I don't actually watch anything on Youtube. I do wonder if there's an upcoming replacement for Youtube like there was for Twitter.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 13 points 6 months ago
[–] jlow@beehaw.org 7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Would sponsorblock be a solution for this?

[–] illi@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

From what I read, this also breaks sponsorblock - as the ads are part of the video, it moves the time stamps of the video so it makes it not correct. The ads will also change I imagine so idk if sponsorblock will be a solution.

[–] jayknight@lemmy.ml 13 points 6 months ago (5 children)

So videos that reference timestamps in their own video won't work? And comments that reference a timestamp won't work?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

With a little adoption yes it could. We could pass around checksums of known good blocks, or checksums of known advertisements. Or the audio signature of known good blocks or the audio signature of known advertisements.

So a service is like sponsor block would now just be a curated list of either good or bad signatures be them checksums or audio signatures or video signatures. There would be some engineering work to account for different compression ratios etc but it's totally doable

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

No, not in it's actual form, nor the front-ends can't not longer cutting the ads with their current form. Or they change their script, or you have the alternative to use YT or using another streaming service. But I think that there will be other solution in the future to show the middle finger to YT.

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago

I'd just drag the time seeker though...

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What are the YT alternatives? I use it by default and I'm to exhausted to look for another landing place

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Odysee ! I use a extention even so if I click a video on YouTube and it is also on odysee it opened odysee instead.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

That is a good question

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Honestly no idea why they didn't just do that to begin with.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Because it’s actually really hard to achieve technically. When ads are served outside the stream you can easily serve different ads to different viewers based on their profiles. When the ads are baked into the stream you can either

A) Create a whole bunch of different copies of the video asset with different ads baked in and then rotate these on a regular basis. Which would be expensive to update and store and limit the range of adverts that could be served to a particular user.

B) Dynamically create a stream on the users request, which while possible means standard CDN caching isn’t going to work so there’s a distribution challenge.

Or some other alternative they’ve come up with. I’d be really interest to know what their approach is here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bademantel@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago

That move would finally rid me of my addiction to YouTube. So much time, so many possibilities...

load more comments
view more: next ›