this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
25 points (76.6% liked)

GenZedong

4289 readers
98 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Actually Assange is the one constant face behind Wikileaks; there is an advisory board, but it's very informal to the point that people on it never did anything, never met the other advisors, and sometimes never even knew they were on it. For all intents and purposes Assange is the only person behind Wikileaks.

If Wikileaks was a federal asset or started as one, then Assange was an asset as well, even if he didn't know it. That's my defense behind the title, which does ask if Assange was a federal asset.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Then what happened to those Chinese anti-gov't leaders that made up the original Wikileaks? Did they just go to other NED-funded USAID-funded projects?

Assange may have been a federal asset, but he face turned in 2010, plus, didn't ye type in this:

I am purposely not singling out Assange here, and that is because he is only one piece of Wikileaks. We will come back to him later but Wikileaks is certainly bigger than just Assange — or at least started out that way — and it is important to separate the two.