859

submitted 4 months ago by Interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 108 points 4 months ago

172.16.0.0/12 is a valid prefix for private networks. In fact, you get more hosts than 192.168.0.0/16, but less than 10.0.0.0/8.

[-] 4am@lemm.ee 76 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it’s not that it’s not valid for private networks, it’s that 172.16.42.x is common for WiFi Pineapples

[-] magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 months ago

Every "well ackqually" person in this thread is insufferable

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 22 points 4 months ago

IDK, I find them quite sufferable and in fact I'm learning something from this thread.

[-] magi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

Can't argue with that, I guess

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024

859 points (100.0% liked)

196

16440 readers

1523 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS