this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
65 points (98.5% liked)
askchapo
22776 readers
364 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
First off, Guns and Roses at their peak had notoriously bad live shows, usually cause axl just wouldn't show up or they were too fucked up, now guns n roses is axl and session people, so yeah, it makes sense that a cover band led by the original lineups biggest liability in a live setting they'd suck. Acdc kept a lineup for the most part aside from the bon Scott thing. I've seen people their age and older either rock way harder in the case of some older punks in reunited or new bands or just have a more well put together and rehearsed set. This also would have been in 2008 or so.