this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
38 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22767 readers
450 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What if I did it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

He literally didn't write it, nor title nor release it as is. A court ordered the book rights be handed over, and they then deliberately made it look like a confession.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The family of one of the victims

[–] shath@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they didn't write the book tho, some other guy did as a ghost writer for oj?

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes - A ghost writer wrote it, including claiming a whole bunch of stuff Simpson disagreed with. Once the rights were transferred, the family changed the title, cover and added their own extra text throughout to look extra incriminating.

[–] shath@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

trying to dig out info on this can you send me anything you've found?

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I mean this is kind of true, but they didn't have the authority to change the contents of the book or the title.

The thing they did to try to make it look like a confession was the graphic design of the cover making the word "If" difficult to see, so that it kind of looks like it's called "I Did It."

I haven't read it so I can't comment on the veracity of shath's comment, but if it is true then it's not because her family changed the text of the book.

EDIT: you know what, looking into it more, it definitely does sound like more was changed than the cover design so I'm just going to say idk what happened here and it could be a significant rewrite, sorry CarbonScored

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

As well as changing the cover, they changed the "subtitle", and added in their own text throughout.

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago

you know what, looking into it more, it definitely does sound like more was changed than the cover design so I'm just going to say idk what happened here and it could be a significant rewrite, sorry CarbonScored

[–] TheLepidopterists@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago

Okay, so I want to pull back a little bit because I'm not an expert on this or anything, but my understanding is that the reason that they changed the cover in the way that they did is that they weren't allowed to actually change the title of the book.

Are you saying that they were allowed to change the title of the book but chose to only change the graphic design, or that they weren't allowed to change the title of the book, but that they were allowed to insert new text into it to make it look more incriminating?