Request to create a 2nd paid only version of the app (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by dialecticcake@lemmy.world to c/syncforlemmy@lemmy.world

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't like the lack of transparency with how the Google Play Store doesn't list the permissions if one pays for the app and instead only shows the permissions if one doesn't pay.

I generally prefer it when devs release two apps -- a free version and a paid version. This way it's very clear on the Google Play Store what is being tracked in the paid app.

This won't affect me personally, but I am curious if others would be more likely to use and pay for Sync if the permissions were more clear for the paid usage case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but Google banned Laurence for that. So maybe you need to start a case in a court of law against Google for abusing their monopoly.

[-] dialecticcake@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Can you or Laurence link me to the policy saying one can't have both a paid and unpaid app? Or are you asserting Google didn't follow their own policy in this regard?

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago

He got banned for it last year.

[-] eco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I don't have a link to the policy but here is LJ saying that's what happened. https://lemmy.world/comment/2009322

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Google definitely does not follow their own policy. It is widely known that they are incredibly inconsistent when it comes to enforcing rules and policies for apps on the Play store, delisting apps for a variety of arbitrary and often incorrect reasons.