32

I don't like the lack of transparency with how the Google Play Store doesn't list the permissions if one pays for the app and instead only shows the permissions if one doesn't pay.

I generally prefer it when devs release two apps -- a free version and a paid version. This way it's very clear on the Google Play Store what is being tracked in the paid app.

This won't affect me personally, but I am curious if others would be more likely to use and pay for Sync if the permissions were more clear for the paid usage case.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dialecticcake@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Can you or Laurence link me to the policy saying one can't have both a paid and unpaid app? Or are you asserting Google didn't follow their own policy in this regard?

[-] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago

He got banned for it last year.

[-] eco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I don't have a link to the policy but here is LJ saying that's what happened. https://lemmy.world/comment/2009322

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Google definitely does not follow their own policy. It is widely known that they are incredibly inconsistent when it comes to enforcing rules and policies for apps on the Play store, delisting apps for a variety of arbitrary and often incorrect reasons.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
32 points (73.5% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15133 readers
14 users here now

๐Ÿ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS