view the rest of the comments
main
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Top Image of the Month will remain the Banner for a Month
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
the reality of achaemenid rule was very light. Alexander was from the part of the greek world that acquiesced to achamenid tribute. Had Darius or Xerxes crushed the barbarians and emplaced some loyalists it would basically just prevent the peloppenesian war which is only important to "le western civilization" creeps in the first place. maybe more focus would be on the west as the italiotes became the standard bearers for 'free greece', probably just in historiography tho unless a spike in immigration made them more able to resist Carthage and Italians.
in any case a triumph over the poor greek savages doesn't seem like something that would rejuvenate the empire, as it became vulnerable and retracted from its furthest commitments there's no reason for its terminal fate not to be sealed from the west anyway. perhaps by the exact same historical personages. overall it's a pretty lame divergence point, California girls of the 30s clearly knew their althistory and recognized when they rely on racist 'clash-of-civilizations' tropes.