this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
205 points (94.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35816 readers
1359 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don't know the reason since i'm not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he's still up for the candidate) supporters. don't know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] socsa@piefed.social 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You haven't seen any of the "genocide Joe" trolls?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

yes I think the bigger problem here is right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My honest interpretation is that there are actually very few right wing propagandists masquerading as lefties, but they are very effective at bringing hapless idiot lefties to their narrative.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

yeah, some mix of that too for sure.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you referring to Lemmy.world?

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look, one of the more active ones. Tell us again how Cuba is a great example of communism working as intended.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Why do you believe that it isn't? Under what pretext does my being a Marxist make me right-wing?

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm not restarting this conversation with you. You've showed your colors when you told me that an article that explains my stance wasn't an explanation of my stance. Only reason you and others like you sre not blocked is because I get a chuckle out of seeing your nonsense, plus I like to help pointing it out for others that might not know it's nonsense.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I asked you what your definition of poverty was, and you shared an article with no reference to definition, only to rate of poverty. I wanted to know how you were defining poverty, as we can track metrics over time and analyze external factors. You were uninterested.

You threw a fit and logged off.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, I'll spell it out for you, maybe you're just that dense. This is a quote from the link, right below the title. The literal subtitle of the article: "seven out of 10 Cubans have stopped eating breakfast, lunch, or dinner due to lack of money or shortages".

If that's not an explanation, then I'm sorry, maybe we have different definitions for the word. So there you go. My definition of poverty in this case is people not having food to eat.

Again, this was at the top of the article, which you'd have seen if you were interested, which you're obviously not. As we've already established, only pretending to be a "lefty"

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Cuba is currently running into issues due to liberalization measures, and betting harder on tourism. This is compounded by the ongoing trade embargo, which hit especially hard during COVID.

Seems like Cuba is now doing worse as it has introduced liberalization measures.

It has since applied to join BRICS, which should see increased trade.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well? What happened? Thought it was a good example? And not another failure in which the people are suffering while the "president" is a rich fuck?

And for those that aren't aware, this "liberalization" had nothing to do with personal freedoms, it's talking about the economy. And it started 30 years ago. And it's getting worse, not better, despite all that time. Any day now, however...

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well? What happened? Thought it was a good example? And not another failure in which the people are suffering while the "president" is a rich fuck?

The system overall is good. The structure is more democratic, LGBTQ rights are better protected than the US by law, and social safety nets are generous. Facing temporary economic struggles in the context of a global pandemic compounded by an ongoing fascist trade embargo does not mean the Cuban system overall is bad. As an example, what would you do?

And for those that aren't aware, this "liberalization" had nothing to do with personal freedoms, it's talking about the economy. And it started 30 years ago. And it's getting worse, not better. Any day now, however...

Why would liberalization mean personal freedoms? Cuba already has high levels of personal freedoms, moreso than America, of course I am referring to introducing more Capitalist market reforms.

Either way, Cuba was steadily improving over time, even beating the US in life expectancy, with lower starvation rates. Their latest slump is again due to being hit particularly hard by COVID.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Again, it was terrible quality of life before the liberalization which started 30 years ago, because that's why it started, and it's gotten worse, not better since. Stop trying to blame it on the pandemic, it was bad before it as I've already said and you've ignored.

As for the other stuff you've mentioned: Good for them on the LGBTQ and healthcare stuff, that's a great thing, however...

"Human rights in Cuba are under the scrutiny of human rights organizations, which accuse the Cuban government of committing systematic human rights abuses against the Cuban people, including arbitrary imprisonment and unfair trials.International human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have drawn attention to the actions of the human rights movement and designated members of it as prisoners of conscience, such as Óscar Elías Biscet. In addition, the International Committee for Democracy in Cuba led by former statesmen Václav Havel of the Czech Republic, José María Aznar of Spain and Patricio Aylwin of Chile was created to support the Cuban dissident movement."

"Press freedom is an ongoing issue in Cuba. The country has ranked low on the Press Freedom Index, a list published by Reporters Without Borders which reflects the degree of freedom that journalists, news organisations, and netizens have in a country. Cuba has been ranked among the index's “least free" countries for a decade."

As someone whose family lived under a similar regime I can tell you one thing: quality of life is more than stats. Stats can be good while real quality of life is shit. Which is what appears to be happening there. Which is what usually(probably always?) happens under authoritarian regimes.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Again, it was terrible quality of life before the liberalization which started 30 years ago, because that's why it started, and it's gotten worse, not better since. Stop trying to blame it on the pandemic, it was bad before it as I've already said and you've ignored.

Citation needed.

International human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch

You're trusting far-right think-tanks on Communist countries? Lmao.

As someone whose family lived under a similar regime I can tell you one thing: quality of life is more than stats. Stats can be good while real quality of life is shit. Which is what appears to be happening there. Which is what usually(probably always?) happens under authoritarian regimes.

Quality of Life must be compared by metrics. Additionally, Cuba is more democratic than the US and similar western countries, and your love of far-right think-tanks doesn't do you any favors.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just quoting Wikipedia. Not sure how that's making me a lover of far right think tanks. You're free to edit it and provide sources for it and it'll be changed if it's wrong.

And yes, metrics such as 7/10 people can't afford food. Not metrics such as "the country with only one political party is more democratic than western countries".

Anyway, we're back to square one. Me quoting sources, you dismissing them and not providing anything in return. Typical. Anyway, nobody's gonna read this far down anyway, so I'm out. Or storming off, as you like to put it. Mark another victory in your calendar. xD

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

I'm just quoting Wikipedia. Not sure how that's making me a lover of far right think tanks. You're free to edit it and provide sources for it and it'll be changed if it's wrong.

You're quoting references to Far-Right think tanks as referenced on Wikipedia, don't white-wash it.

And yes, metrics such as 7/10 people can't afford food. Not metrics such as "the country with only one political party is more democratic than western countries".

Yes, metrics change over time. Cubans on average are more food secure than US citizens over the last few decades, only recently has this changed. Additionally, Cuba is indeed more democratic, if you think democracy is measured by party and not by what and who you can vote on, you're woefully misinformed.

Anyway, we're back to square one. Me quoting sources, you dismissing them and not providing anything in return. Typical. Anyway, nobody's gonna read this far down anyway, so I'm out. Or storming off, as you like to put it. Mark another victory in your calendar. xD

Gotcha, will do. Victory number 2 against you.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

What on Earth are you talking about?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They’ve all but vanished after Biden dropped out of the race.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

you've stopped seeing comments about Biden once he became irrelevant?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, I stopped seeing”genocide Joe” comments. People still discuss Biden, he’s sill President.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

until he fucks off soon. the whole point of genocide Joe comments is that people don't want four more years of him.

but of course thankfully Harris says she'll help the genocide too so we'll see how that goes.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're popping back up again recently, attacking Harris of course

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Too difficult to come up with something for Harris that rolls off the tongue as easily as “Genocide Joe.”

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've seen "Holocaust Harris" coming into fashion.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a bad name, the Holocaust refers to a specific genocide.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Never said it was a good one, just that I have seen it.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Careful with that troll word, there are mods that will ban you for saying it. They tell you to report trolls to them, so I did (a very obvious troll) and I got banned. Pretty neat you can't appeal, and you can't find out which mod did it either.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Just show mod. Not which mod.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't show what mod did it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Use the photon UI on desktop.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just tried it, still doesn't show which mod is banning or deleting.

[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 1 points 2 months ago

You can only see which mod did it if you're an admin

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are you taking about? Lemmy.world loves to ban those pointing out genocide supporters. Cause totally every one who wishes Israel to stop the genocide is a dirty republican. At least that's how the mods treat them

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Because it's a bad faith argument.

There's no candidate that opposes Israel's actions.

It's certainly okay, even preferable, to be critical of our administration, but it serves no point to bring it up in a discussion of the election, because it serves only to de-rail the conversation when any candidate who matters supports the genocide.