this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1630 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5409 readers
3744 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 92 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I've gotten so used to school shootings that I see one like that and think "hooray, only four deaths!"

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it did work out better than others, and yet two teachers and two 14 year old children were killed.

The FBI had been out to see the 14yr old who murdered classmates and teachers. Spoken with his parents, and him. He denied everything, no probable cause, so they put the schools on alert, and that made for a quicker response.

Which means this went really well by comparison to other school shootings, and yet it clearly wasn't good enough - two 14 year old students and two teachera died.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The FBI had been out to see the 14yr old who murdered classmates and teachers. Spoken with his parents, and him. He denied everything, no probable cause, so they put the schools on alert, and that made for a quicker response.

Oh, so we knew this kid was a problem but we didn't actually do anything but tell the school to be ready to get shot up.

What a fucking stupid country.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They also went to the kids house and investigated, but they didn't have proof of anything that would meet any criteria for arrest, yeah.

So they discussed with the parents, discussed with the school, discussed with the police, etc. I can't say I blame the FBI here for what they were able to do based on anonymous reports about comments made online. I wouldn't feel comfortable with giving any federal agency just free reign to arrest on anonymous reports alone, that's just opening a new form of swatting to me.

But clearly, its not enough, and that's the issue. For example, restricting the access to guns would have been good. Restricting access on a larger scale would be better.

Instead... We have two teachers and two 14yr old kids dead.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The school could have suspended him after hearing he was investigated by the FBI. I wonder if the school even told any of the parents about this. I'd be furious if the school knew this kid was a threat and did nothing to keep him away from other students.

I gotta stop talking about this and find some funny memes because my kid is currently at a high school now, and could be the next victim, and not having any power or knowledge about someone shooting them fills me with rage and frustration.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not really - same problem, no proof it was him that posted. The kid having access to guns after being seen as a person who might do this, that's the problem.

The parents doing functionally nothing is a problem.

The total lack of any change from this is also a problem.

My kids are younger, but unfortunately that just means more years of worry at this point, because nothing is changing.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the administrators are too busy following the rules to deal with anything, from bullying to shootings. I bet they'd let a baby die in a hot car because it's against the rules to break the window.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think you're underestimating how many times the FBI (police, whomever) go out and speak with someone. There will be a lot of kids who did nothing wrong, who have not planned to do anything wrong, which would be suspended or otherwise "handled".

That's not good either. Especially when the issue is quite obviously guns and complete lack of laws around them in GA.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If the school can't suspend him for allegedly making this threat there's no way they'd be able to take the guns out of the house for the same thing. There's no right to an education in the Constitution, but there is a right to bear arms.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There was no proof it was him who made a threat - that's the point.

There are ways to take away weapons from people when a threat is credible, during the course of an investigation.

There should be more limits on access to guns regardless.

The constitution needs an update. For one, this was not the purpose of the second amendment, and two, its an amendment - just like every other aspect of the constitution, it can be changed.

There is no gun crime without guns. The idea that we need to look anywhere else is, to me, absolutely ludicrous and shameful.

Edit: Regarding the edit - the fact that there is no right to education is also a problem, albeit a different one.

The idea that the 2nd amendment exists but nothing regarding education does should not mean "Well fuck all these kids because 1 out of several hundred may have actually been a threat" is completely deranged to me. Sorry, but there is no world where you're going to convince me otherwise. The problem is the guns.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm saying that if I were a principal and the FBI let me know they talked to a kid my response wouldn't be to wait for him to show up, regardless of what the rules say, because I care more about kids not getting shot than the rules. Which is why I'm not a principal.

Also, if the threat wasn't credible enough to suspend him, it was definitely not credible enough to remove the guns from his parents' possession. The guns would still have been there.

Anyways, this topic pisses me off more than the awful conference call I'm avoiding so I'm not going to respond anymore.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

I agree its good you're not the principal.

And I would disagree on not being able to seize weapons, hell they can seize anything without a crime today, that's what civil asset forfeiture is. No crime even needs to be committed, no arrest needs to be made, and its legal for them to do today. Republicans would lose their collective marbles over it though - but fuck them.

But directly incarcerating (or punishing kids based on an unknown set of anonymous sources) would absolutely be a problem.

I hope your day gets better.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just wanted to mention, more information has come out.

The investigation was in May 2023. His dad bought him the gun used to kill two children and two teachers as a Christmas present, in 2023. After the visit from the FBI.

His dad has now been arrested as well.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 21 points 2 months ago

4 victims is the minimum for it to count as a "mass shooting" by the FBI, which seems like both too many and not enough at the same time.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah I was watching something on TV and they cut to a special news report to cover this. I was shocked. Isn’t there a school shooting pretty much every day now? Why did this warrant cutting into valuable day time TV programming? So I’m watching this breaking news wondering what’s so special about this particular shooting that can’t wait until the nightly news at 10:00, and the local police chief is giving a press conference breaking down in tears about how he never thought he would have to handle a school shooting and I’m like has your dimbass been paying attention to anything that’s been going on in this country for the last few decades? I would expect you to have a manual on your desk with procedures on how to handle this. Instead this yokel is rambling on about good and evil. I just smh.

[–] RaccoonBall@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I had to do an unfortunate amount of scrolling after clicking 2020s…

Quick edit: by gawd the kid’s name was literally Colt

It's a little less than once per week, on average. School shootings are much more rare. Wikipedia has the list, but it makes me too depressed to go through and tally it up to get the average.

Considering there are tens of thousands of schools across the US, most cops will never have to deal with a mass shooting, much less a school shooting.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Once people think it's normal then that becomes a culture. That is even harder to remove.