202
submitted 21 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Police have shot and killed a polar bear that came ashore in northwestern Iceland, the first sighting of a polar bear there since 2016. It might have hitched a ride from Greenland on a floating iceberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

That's a lot of justification for killing something that can go fishing for food.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 110 points 20 hours ago

polar bears will absolutely hunt humans for food without a second thought. And you will not be able to outrun them or scare them away.

This one came quite close to homes, which is a reason for almost all towns with polar bears in the area to shoot them.

That this bear was the first in quite a while is a sad thing, but it's understandable that the town doesn't want a bear mauling people for a snack

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago

If it's black, fight back. If it's brown, lie down. If it's white, good night.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

What about grizzly bears? I thought they also give no fucks and will kill you no matter what you do.

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 13 hours ago

This reads like it's justified.

We destroy their habitats so they need to come to us to survive only to get killed by us.

Sounds like we are just bad guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 20 hours ago

Except that's not how Polar Bears prefer to hunt. They prefer to hunt by holes over pack ice, where they wait for animals like seals to surface for air. When there's no pack ice, which is what is happening thanks to global warming, they hunt for whatever they can on land. And if that land is inhabited by humans, that means humans.

I would say the potential to kill and eat humans, including infants, is excellent justification.

Does it suck that this is our fault to begin with? Absolutely. That doesn't mean that human lives should be put at risk as well.

load more comments (56 replies)
[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

but can they actually go fishing for food? If a wild animal is wandering into human territory, there is usually a resource-limiting reason for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
202 points (97.6% liked)

World News

38583 readers
2140 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS