209
submitted 23 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Police have shot and killed a polar bear that came ashore in northwestern Iceland, the first sighting of a polar bear there since 2016. It might have hitched a ride from Greenland on a floating iceberg.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 112 points 22 hours ago

polar bears will absolutely hunt humans for food without a second thought. And you will not be able to outrun them or scare them away.

This one came quite close to homes, which is a reason for almost all towns with polar bears in the area to shoot them.

That this bear was the first in quite a while is a sad thing, but it's understandable that the town doesn't want a bear mauling people for a snack

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 23 points 17 hours ago

If it's black, fight back. If it's brown, lie down. If it's white, good night.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

What about grizzly bears? I thought they also give no fucks and will kill you no matter what you do.

[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 14 hours ago

This reads like it's justified.

We destroy their habitats so they need to come to us to survive only to get killed by us.

Sounds like we are just bad guys.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

It does seem justified to save a person's life

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 13 hours ago

It is justified.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

Read the article. They don't even go onto that. They have a shoot on sight policy regardless.

[-] brenticus@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

If you can see a polar bear it's a threat.

They really aren't like other bear species. They are an apex predator in an area where basically nothing other than another polar bear can even harm them. They see most things as food, including humans.

As a bonus, Iceland has a pretty wonky ecosystem that needs protecting as is and polar bears aren't native to the island. They have to swim extreme distances to get there, making relocation extremely difficult and expensive, plus if they leave it be it will entirely disrupt other wildlife in the area, to say nothing of the human population.

As others have said, it sucks that it got shot, but Iceland especially has very limited options on how else to deal with it. Shoot on sight is, unfortunately, a very reasonable policy for them.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

A whole ass country can't afford to trap and relocate 1 Bear per decade?

That's ridiculous.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 12 hours ago

Yes. Because they're not going to wait until someone got turned into kibble for something to do

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago

Which isn't the reason the Iceland government gives. Again. Go read the article. But also that's the same excuse we almost made wolves extinct with. Animals as a rule avoid people when possible.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38583 readers
2115 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS