this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
604 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hmm.

That seems like it'd open a lot of potential abuses.

I wonder what the failure mode of various electronic locks is when they're exposed to helium?

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you are in a position where you can dump random gases into the air supply to the degree it impacts these devices then they are likely compromised in other ways as well.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You don't necessarily need to put it into the air supply, could just bathe the specific device you want disabled in helium from a deodorant can or something

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is helium used in deodorants these days?

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Not that I know of, I meant it could be put in a pressurised spray bottle, for example a deodorant can

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you are close enough to spray a device you are close enough to just steal it. Or spray the owner.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it's bolted to a wall and unattended neither of those things are an option

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If y9ou are close enough to a system of importance that you can spray it, you are close enough to compromise it in countless other ways.

This is just one of many physical access attacks. Just like "you could take a hammer to it"

Like, I know people want to think this is some Ocean's Eleven heist waiting to happen. It isn't. This is only viable if you can drench an area with helium (which means you can already gas everyone you care about) or you have such close physical access that there are so many other things you could do. At best it is an episode of Burn Notice where Michael has to rapidly improvise an escape where his CIA handler of the week already refused to give him something much more useful.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Just because you can take a hammer to it doesn't mean that's the best solution

In the right situation I imagine it could be a useful tool, much more subtle than just smashing the thing, less time consuming than taking it apart

[–] xor@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago

a very small percentage of helium will disable the phone

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know about that. It seemed to have a pretty rapid impact on the phone in that video, and it's not like those are exactly open. And they weren't pressurizing it.

[–] IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Helium is tiny, and will diffuse though pretty much anything other than continuous welded metal pipe very very quickly. The elastomer seals on a phone would slow it down slightly, but the article's from 2018, before so many phones were watertight. I remember my old iPhone had a little piezo cooling fan in one of the grates on the bottom, so helium would have no trouble at all.

[–] 4th_Times_A_Charm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Lock picking lawyer gonna have to get on this