this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
114 points (98.3% liked)

askchapo

22765 readers
454 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically a repost pf things I said in the mega, but anecdotally I'm hearing that sales of fiction read by men are dropping precipitously, and English and literature classes in colleges are now dominated by women. It seems like young men are not being exposed to literature in the same way that they used to. Like, when I was in high school and college, you could be a "bro" kind of guy and read Chuck Palahniuk, or Hunter S. Thompson, or David Foster Wallace. For decades, authors like Hemmingway and Bukowski found receptive audiences in young men, not to mention all the crime fiction, horror, sci-fi, and fantasy that men have traditionally consumed. The "guy in your English class who loves David Foster Wallace" was a stereotype for a reason. I read in another thread that music is less culturally important to young men than it used to be. It seems like younger men just straight up see no value in reading literature or fiction, or exposing themselves or critically engaging with art and music, because the algorithms just railroad them into Alpha Gridset world.

Am I wrong about this? Am I being condescending and out of touch, or is this a real thing that's happening, where the whole "male" culture is turning into grindset podcasts and streamers?

Edit: Okay, so the impression I'm getting is that everything is worse but also kind of the same as it ever was, which sounds right.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate him less than Justin Roiland and I admit Harmonquest was funny for the most part.

He can be a devotee to a misogynistic asshole with petty dogmatic narration rules if he wishes.

[–] Tiocfaidhcaisarla@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm a pig for his slop for sure

Glad Roiland is facing some amount of justice

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Harmon wasn't such an anti-union "I worked hard and everyone else is lazy" bourgeoisie asshole, I'd feel less gross watching his shows.

[–] Tiocfaidhcaisarla@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

I feel that 100%

I was a fan of his podcast but whenever he strayed into his own- or often fucking America's- myth-making, I wanted to breath fire at him. Also when he had people come on simping for Clinton.

Funny guy though and he did bring a DSA guys a few times