94
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)
The Dredge Tank
216 readers
449 users here now
The Dredge Tank. For posting all the low tier reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else. Got some bullshit from Reddit with 2 upvotes and want to share, post it here.
This community was created with the purpose that Rule 8 fans will just block it.
The rules are literally The Dunk Tank's rules, just without rule 8.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god? Complete and utter self-report.
How the hell is he considered a beauty standard?
It's blind-leading-the-blind chuddery. They don't ask feeemales what is attractive, so they have this weird fixation on what they think is attractive to feeemales and want to back that up with coercion and violence.
lewd discussion on sex
Being a "sex god", to the type of "man" Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman's pleasure doesn't factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that's enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn't matter, it's never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That's his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.Living pornographic kayfabe, if you will
i actually don't think that's true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don't talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of "pleasing women"
Is this some kind of weird neo-puritanism do-not-cum
incel pandering thing?
it is for some of the consumers of this, but in general it's just an appeal to the classic misogynistic notion of women as property
I'm kind of glad I don't really understand these guys at all. "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" is really trite right until it isn't.