DragonBallZinn

joined 11 months ago
[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 3 hours ago

That’s ok…science will bring me presents!

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 13 hours ago

"Because we CAN and its FUN!"

4chan won, they're going to go full mask off.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 18 points 15 hours ago

All that talent wasted on trolling a cozy game.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm sure someone much smarter than I have made this connection, but does anyone else feel like burgerland is both a colony (I mean, it is a settler colonial nation but you know what I mean) by the ruling class as well as an empire?

The United States seems to be unique in how it embraces the imperial boomerang almost as part of its culture. In political science there's this guns vs butter concept which is balancing how much to spend on defense and similar things (guns) vs butter (social programs, or pretty much everything else). The US subsidizes a lot of Europe's military and this country is almost happy to be Europe's personal attack dog, most likely to help it exploit Latin America and the Caribbean much more effectively. Domestically, austerity is practically a way of life. Little to no workers rights, abysmal and ugly infrastructure, a decreasing literacy rate, no universal healthcare, and education is now changing to be something only for the rich with literacy rates going down the toilet and a culture of fervent anti-intellectualism. All of this really makes you think "all that imperialism for THIS!?" But then that hit me: what if all this exploitation isn't solely the idea of the American elites. Sure, they most definitely benefit a lot, but I doubt that they're the sole beneficiaries as the ruling class is every bit as internationalist as the proletariat, so no doubt that American elites have a stronger sense of class solidarity than their so-called "nationalistic" fervor they so hypocritically claim.

I'm already aware of shit like segregation and both The Color of Law and The New Jim Crow are on my reading list, so I know that this is the case because of what the federal government as done to non-white communities, but ironically the imperial boomerang steps in and they do similar things to the very white people they claim to be fighting for the interests of. I forgot where, but a kkk member joked that if they ever got their ethnostate they'd just oppress each other.

Another kkkrackkka down!

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 35 points 1 day ago

She didn’t offer voters what they really wanted

Which is….

…oh, actually being a politician and delivering on issues is the crass tactic they’re talking about.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Found out about Webfishing. Pretty good game and the userbase is pretty wholesome.

Cozy game + LGBT support seems to be good enough tourist repellent, but I’m sure dipshit trolls are planning something.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I said it before and I’ll say it again: I thought techbros were supposed to be smart.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 22 points 1 day ago

I never want to see Thielcels parade around like they’re the real technocrats and we’re all just rubes.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The only good thing about republicans in charge is that it’s open season for radicalizing libs.

I have a couple accounts for trolling and this is what I do. Any time there’s a major fuckup, I try to say something along the lines of “maybe the rich were lying when they said lgbt people are the problem.”

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

Oof, seems like I just missed it.

Will this be a regular thing?

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As far as the best liberalism had to offer, here's mine: Thomas Paine, Rousseau, Henry George. John Stuart Mill, Robespierre.

I feel like most of them could be comrades if push comes to shove, but they exemplify the liberalism I would more than happily live under

 

To me, Silicon Valley is a confusing beast. I'm not sure if this is remaining liberalism but there are some things about it (on the surface level) that I find admirable: it's generally science-positive and is a beacon of intellectualism in the US, even if tech is not your cup of tea I like the idea of some people being in the "problem solving business", and if I must participate in capitalism then working for a company that helps with sustainability in SV doesn't sound too bad. Not ideal, but leagues more tolerable than working on an oil field.

However, this facade crumbles at even the quickest glance and it sometimes almost becomes just as nakedly reactionary as the oil and gas industry. Elon Musk is practically the poster child of Silicon Valley and was a lib that just needed one scratch to give up the ghost and go full fash. Silicon Valley is literally acting like an Ayn Rand villain. Silicon Valley has also practically soured my attitudes towards technology and some of that can be blamed on pretty much all new "innovations" just being inventing a new form of landlordism. Even many of the people in the supposed blue city are complete and utter fash, the whole thing feels like it's permanently an 80s Wall Street movie but with tech.

Is there like any books that can better explain Silicon Valley and what it actually stands for?

 

I know a huge thing that you see online is talks about different generations, and it almost seems as if to me that for some folks, “generational conflict” has replaced class conflict. Furthermore, I worry that the American dream was supposed to die so everyday baby boomers could buy houses and see their property values go up hundredfold and invite otherwise working class folk into an “honorary bourgeoisie” system. But ultimately this is still a class struggle rather than a generation struggle. Like I’m gen Z and I do not see baby boomers as my oppressor, there’s plenty of millennial landlords ready to rip me off because LinkedIn told him to liquidate his assets’ or whatever idk I don’t speak Porkuguese.

I’m no exception, I’ve made my guesses on why any given generation is the way it is, but I can’t help but wonder when did this focus on generation over class all start? Did baby boomers grow up identifying as baby boomers, and when they were in their 20s-40s was there this idea that millennials were going to be their designated bagholders? If so, did baby boomers always have a consistent culture and identity?

Sorry if this is a dumb question, it’s just that the generational struggle seems really flimsy upon further scrutiny.

 

LMAO. CHUD gets what he wants and then gets bored from lack of brown people to lord over.

Whether fascists want to admit it or not, they need minorities but minorities don't need them. Ergo, making minorities superior to white supremacists.

 
view more: next ›