94
Greatest sexual self-own since Shapiro’s “my wife has never had a wet-ass pussy.”
I can't think of that song without thinking of 
's "Wet-Ass P-Word" parody.
Honestly, I don’t think even he takes what he says seriously. Dude is scum of the earth, but this is literally to get a reaction out of people
Even if that is the case I'm not sure people pointing and laughing is his intended reaction.
"haha i'm terrible in bed! cope and seethe liberals"
everyone thinks he's terrible in bed
"fools! i was merely baiting you! i have won!"
I mean yeah, it’s a bit. More specifically, it’s Dick Masterson’s bit from the 90s. I grew up watching this guy on Ricki Lake and it’s been surreal seeing Tate just shamelessly bite his persona.
These manosphere types talk about woman's orgasm like its the shroud of turin 
The sploosh of Turin 
Are they laughing "ha ha they think we don't believe in orgasms" in their forums somewhere or are we supposed to read this straight?
unironically he might be asexual. he talks about sex as if all that's in it for him is the power dynamic of doing the fucking. very similar to trump in that regard actually.
I suspect what he gets off to is the hatred and the power trip of his SV shit. Like "RooshV" of BAAAAAAAAAAAANG infamy, there's no room for joy when it's all some rage filled power game for such chuds.
The sort of guy that has brutalised sex out of themselves and can only imagine everyone is doing it for domination and bragging rights among the bros
Seeing as how Trump hooked up with a pornstar and all he did was raw dog her, I think you have a point.
I see too many manosphere types saying the "Female orgasms aren't real!" kind of shit so often that I genuinely can't believe it.
It has to be like a secret bit "between the bros" or something at this point. This is just absurd.
The most euphoric of the "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" cryptofascists even go as far as claiming that there's no scientific purpose for feeemale orgasms, therefore they can't exist.
Because feeemales experiencing pleasure during sex would have no scientific purpose. 
Because feeemales experiencing pleasure during sex would have no scientific purpose.
It doesn't. The female orgasm couldn't solve a single mathematical theorem
My partners orgasm has never defended its dissertation either.
Checkmate liberals.
I've never seen an ORGASM cook me DINNER
Not surprised, but way to tell on yourself, fucking bozo 
Chrome-dome over here can't even pass the bare minimum
just a big old wrinkly brain up there.
If he can't make it happen, it doesn't exist.
He's such a narcissist that he can't even see what a self own it is to say what he said out loud while so many of the rest of us can attest that-
... You get what I mean.
Lol, I literally heard the volcel judge in my head clear his throat to make himself known.
I imagined volcel dredd slowly and motionless like a statue sliding horizontally with grinding stone noise with that scowl, and a doubletake you wise up lmao
Had anyone considered that he might be gay? Like one of those "eww vaginas are gross 🤢" sorta misogynistic gay guys? I just get that vibe sometimes.
It's a prominent theory, actually
Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god? Complete and utter self-report.
How the hell is he considered a beauty standard?
It's blind-leading-the-blind chuddery. They don't ask feeemales what is attractive, so they have this weird fixation on what they think is attractive to feeemales and want to back that up with coercion and violence.
lewd discussion on sex
Being a "sex god", to the type of "man" Andrew Tate is, basically involves getting as many women as possible to sleep with you through general sleazy schemes and pick up artistry. The woman's pleasure doesn't factor once into the equation. As long as she acts out an adequate performance (act being the key word) and fakes an orgasm, that's enough. He knows the whole thing is fake but it doesn't matter, it's never spoken about and they move on and continue. Real life becomes an act of pornographic performance. That's his whole brand. Muscular guy with supercars sleeping with lots of hot women.
Living pornographic kayfabe, if you will
Isn't his whole brand about the fact that he is supposedly a sex god?
i actually don't think that's true for any of these guys. sexual competency requires a certain amount of empathy and compassion that none of these fucks are interested in. they really don't talk about it either. for the set that is most interested in the particular message of gender norms that they offer, the dominance is much more important than any notion of "pleasing women"
Is this some kind of weird neo-puritanism do-not-cum 
incel pandering thing?
it is for some of the consumers of this, but in general it's just an appeal to the classic misogynistic notion of women as property
I'm kind of glad I don't really understand these guys at all. "Feminism is the radical notion that women are people" is really trite right until it isn't.
Jesus Christ this is embarrassing.
Why would someone post this; isn't "being terrible in bed" extremely bad for his brand?
Trivial: Failure.
Was that originally said as a serious belief? 
Yes
Omg it's the 
of sex
This is what happens when you focus only on yourself during sex. Not surprising a man like this can't get us off.
INCREDIBLE self own
There are so many things I could say but all I can say is "is this your dude?"
An Imgur link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
94 points (100.0% liked)
The Dredge Tank
215 readers
486 users here now
The Dredge Tank. For posting all the low tier reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else. Got some bullshit from Reddit with 2 upvotes and want to share, post it here.
This community was created with the purpose that Rule 8 fans will just block it.
The rules are literally The Dunk Tank's rules, just without rule 8.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS