this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
1409 points (85.8% liked)

Linux

48691 readers
916 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reading about FOSS philosophy, degoogling, becoming against corporations, and now a full-blown woke communist (like Linus Torvalds)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 214 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Linux and open source in general completely blow apart capitalist arguments that profit motive is necessary for innovation and technological advancement. Open source ecosystem primarily run by volunteers has produces some of the most interesting and innovative technologies that we've seen. The reality is that people make interesting things because they're curious and they enjoy making stuff. Pretty much nobody makes anything interesting with profit being the primary motive.

[–] ThereRisesARedStar@hexbear.net 106 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Also without open source the capitalist tech sector would collapse

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

capitalist arguments that profit motive is necessary for innovation and technological advancement

I don't know who is arguing this because it's incredibly stupid. The greatest scientific minds of history, the mathematicians, the physicists, the inventors, were not capitalists, they're people with passion for their work.

If we move to a society that guarantees basic human needs and good education, we're only going to have more scientists and engineers that progress technology even faster.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And while we are at it... novelists, poets, painters, musicians, philosophers, ...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] S_H_K@lemmy.fmhy.net 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The innovation argument is shaky at best many of the corporations innovations are brought or copied really. Is a story that became pretty common in the latest decades one guy come with a good idea some other mofo takes it and profits with it.

[–] ConfusedLlama@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's why it's important to use hard copyleft licenses like the GPLv3 instead of merely open-source MIT or BSD licenses wherever possible when you publish software.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Indeed, the corps did a whole campaign lobbying for permissive licenses precisely so they could plunder open source work. Hard copyleft should be used for any serious project.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 195 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

I was feeling the last part had some more story behind it so I went ahead and found this:

Seems like I'm a full-blown woke communist too

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't read like he's an actual communist, more insulting people (rightly so) that would call liberals communists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

er... did torvalds just say trans rights? based alert

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's strange to me that any of the things he said is controversial.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 116 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Context for those who are baffled (I was)

https://news.itsfoss.com/linus-torvalds-woke-communists/

No Linus hasn't grabbed a red rag and isn't off to foment revolution

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I liked the take by the utterly clueless Polish guy in the comment. I think his complete lack of understanding of any context is quite typical of online political conversation, especially when semantics come into play.

Also Linus did call for "Total world domination" (I have the tshirt).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (14 children)

The Linux to trans anarchocommunist catgirl pipeline is very real. The moment you move to Arch it's already over.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ConfusedLlama@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

rant:

I have been using Linux since 2006, a lefty and against the super-rich and big corporations since I remember (to the point of avoiding their products like the plague), also never having understood or accepted gender roles and other stupid traditional concepts, yet never turned into a communist 🤷

It baffles me that so many people think that respecting gender equality, understanding the evil in big corporations and avoiding them, valuing community and being tolerant (except for intolerance) and against discrimination somehow equals communism... I say this because I've been called a communist by many people who know me, while I have always rejected it explicitly!

/rant

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Linus Torvalds is a "full-blown woke communist"? Citation needed.

I have been a FOSS enthusiast since my preteen or early teenage years (mid-to-late 2000s), yet I am not in any sense a communist.

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"full-blown woke communist" is US-speak for "Scandinavian socialist"

The term you want is social democrat, which isn't socialism but hey, it tries to like, stop people starving to death on the street, if only because it looks ugly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] machiabelly@hexbear.net 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] The_Jewish_Cuban@hexbear.net 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

unfortunately I think this is just him saying he's a "woke communist" if being a woke communist is atheism, women's rights, and gun control. I don't think he's a marxist of any stripe it seems. However, I am willing to be corrected here. I've only seen this post regarding to him.

But Linux is programming-communism

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mustardman@hexbear.net 52 points 1 year ago

fidel-salute-big welcome comrade!

[–] whou@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I too just turned into a Marxist after finding out about Linux and software freedom in 2020 lol

I think there might be more than a handful of us. Welcome, comrade.

[–] imAadesh@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago
[–] bear@slrpnk.net 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...I just didn't want windows advertising to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ITT: people who have no idea what communism is

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Fine, but dont defend tyranical regimes. They are bad no mather who they say they read. They could could claim to be following the teachings of fucking Mr Roggers but if they have concentration camps then thats not utopic or very humanitarian in my opinion, specially if ther is some mad dictator in power with everything no matter how manny extra steps are in between.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] thebrownhaze@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago
[–] M68040@hexbear.net 32 points 1 year ago

Part of how I got here involves reading an assload of textfiles from the '90s and growing disillusioned with the fruits of that optimistic '90s techno-libertarianism

[–] tal@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

https://moneyinc.com/linus-torvalds-net-worth/

How Linus Torvalds Achieved a Net Worth of $150 Million

Red Hat and VA Linux went public, and since they acknowledged it would not have been possible without the programmer, Torvalds received shares reportedly worth $20 million. Before it went public, Red Hat had allegedly paid Torvalds $1 million in stock, which the programmer claims was the only big payout he received.

He revealed that the rest of the stock Transmeta and another Linux startup awarded him were not worth much by the time he could sell them. However, in the case of his Red Hat stock, it must have been worth his while because, in 2012, Red Hat became the first $1 billion open-source company when it reached the billion-dollar mark in annual revenue.

Whether he exercised his stock options is unclear, but the money he makes from the gains could be the reason why his net worth has continued to soar.

Well, that's one definition of being communist, I suppose. Myself, I think that it's fairly safe to say that Torvalds is okay with private ownership of industry.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel called out.

I'm not quite there yet but im definitly at the second to last block

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally same, even the years match up lol

load more comments (1 replies)

Shit this is too accurate

load more comments
view more: next ›