this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
222 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

60515 readers
6327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This is all theatre, trump is going to "save it" after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

It's the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. "Wow, I owe you my life!"

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago

Do it, just do it with no second thoughts. They can't, they will lose all their business.

[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Please criticize the us government for this as hard as I have been criticizing China for locking it's citizens out of the world stage with their "great firewall".

Or don't, it's not like hypocrisy doesn't get enshrined and worshipped here lmfaoooo

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 4 points 13 hours ago

It's simply not even close.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're shutting down instead of blocking new downloads, seems like a stunt. But the blocking of new downloads is obviously happening if SCOTUS doesn't step in...that's the law. That's just what the law says.

[–] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

The law prevents other American companies from hosting their infrastructure so they don't really have much to do other than shut down and offer the minimum required to off-board employees and contractors.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

get a vpn (that isn't proton) now people cause it'll only get worse

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

And learn how to use it.

And get your FF fork loaded up with the right extensions to prevent fingerprinting.

Ugh, this world is so cooked, but we keep reaching out of the oven and turning up the heat on ourselves.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I just bought a year of it :(

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] valkyre09@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How come not proton? Did they get caught with their hands in the ~~cookie jar~~ traffic logs?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEO honestly thinks Trump and the Republicans are going to go after tech monopolies. Either he's detached from reality or he's trying to keep them from coming after Proton by cooperating. Either way is not great.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and cozying up to american gov no matter who it is just gives me bad vibes that they would happily turn over anything they want when asked

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

this is the most succint way of verbalising my problems with the situation. i know ceo's largely sway R, i'm not surprised by andy's politic pov. but this tweet was openly eating trumps ass which gives me the ick. like bro you are a ceo i know youre a lying pos but now you're a liar and want to rim the nazis, your business is founded on trust how the fuck can i trust you?

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Zuckerberg is behind it, just like he was when they banned it on India. Politicians get what they want by eliminating a company that doesn't support them, Meta gets more usershare in the U.S. they can control the narrative and keep their guys in place so they don't get regulated and they get more tax breaks.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In other words, the US government exists solely to serve its wealthiest constituents.

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Meanwhile China says no American internet sites in their country and I guess that’s ok for some reason.

No one is saying that. Two governments can be wrong simultaneously.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Censorship is bad when China does it. Censorship is bad when America does it.

Same for Germany, Australia, Japan, North and South Korea.

Governments don't censor speech because they protect their citizens, they censor speech because it protects their monopoly on violence and help propagate their visions to an unquestioning audience.

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's not ok that the CCP block foreign apps either. Now that the yanks are blocking Chinese apps they can't complain about the CCP blocking theirs.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What if we complain about both

[–] notgold@aussie.zone 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

But yanks aren't allowed to?

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

who said it was ok?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (23 children)

They are going to ban themselves as protest for banning them..?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Um, well, they are first of all complying with the decision, in spirit. When someone has indicated to you, even in very diplomatic terms, that you may be unwelcome, it’s a reasonable response to stand right up and walk the fuck out.

Secondly I think they are doing it swiftly and abruptly to take advantage of this moment of public awareness. They want to create as abrupt a break as possible no doubt to maximize the outrage of their many millions of users and advertisers while everyone has the news fresh in their mind. They probably hope that this will create enough pain and disruption to stir opposition to the ban or at least political fallout for those who caused it.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›