this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
247 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30561 readers
138 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anteaters@feddit.de 107 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fandom.com has always been a pile of barely usable garbage. More projects should follow and self host a wiki again.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 86 points 1 year ago (7 children)

a core issue for moving wikis is that Fandom refuses to delete the old wiki so you 1) have to fight an SEO war against them; and 2) have to contend with directing everyone to the right place or else you have two competing wikis (one of which will gradually lapse out of date). it's very irritating.

[–] silverdk@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Path of Emilie community made an extension to remove fandom from Google results and automatically link to the real wiki. Hopefully more communities make something similar.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can one follow on that path of Emilie?

[–] peter@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

I believe that extension is mentioned in the OP

[–] z3n0x@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

wait. they have something in their Terms of Service that prevents you from deleting stuff you posted? That sounds illegal.

[–] lemonflavoured@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It almost certainly is in the EU.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not if their ToS makes you surrender your copyright to them.

[–] Tarte@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is not legally possible in the EU. You can grant irrevocable usage rights, but you cannot give away your copyright.

[–] rnd@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Most Terms of Service don't do that, instead asking you to provide a "perpetual" "irrevocable" "transferable" license for your content -- and while some absolutely stretch the terms to allow them to use it for things like language model learning or shifty monetization practices, such a license is also legally necessary for the website to function at all.

For "open-source" websites like Wikipedia or OSM, the terms are usually even simpler - you agree to license your posts under the same license that they use to distribute it.

As for Fandom specifically, they seem to mostly operate on the latter model -- though you still need an additional commercial use waiver if you want to submit to NC or ND-licensed wikis (which once again goes into the "legally necessary" box).

The same open-source license that lets people edit the wikis and fork them to independent websites without having to ask permission from every single contributor also lets Fandom admins reject attempts to delete or redirect pages.

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

i'm pretty sure this is because of two things: 1) they actually host the wikis and the administrators of them simply steward them; and 2) everything is licensed under CC-BY-SA anyways, so you don't retain the right to revoke things you contribute or the right to move the wiki.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

A gdpr request on content you create but do not own just anonymizes the references to who created and edited the articles you contributed to

[–] TwilightVulpine@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I don't see Fandom winning these wars when their site is so bloated with ads. Whenever I end up there I immediately want to leave.

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ugh yeah. especially the SEO war thing, the new website doesn't even register on DuckDuckGo yet. at least there's this extension called Indie Wiki Buddy which will hide Fandom results from search engines and redirect you to an independent wiki if you end up on Fandom anyway

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if there are no alternative wikis?

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it redirects you to BreezeWiki, a no-bloat frontend for Fandom (example)

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Hm, I guess it's an alternative. I'll give it a try. The Fandom & Fextralife wikis constantly being at the top search results often pisses me off.

[–] fwygon@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hmm. Is there something against linking external wikis on every article you create?

[–] alyaza@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they'll revert that and ban you for "vandalism" (i assume they have automated sensors for checking this), and/or turn your wiki over to new administrators.

[–] gullible@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Unless you’re careful about it, they ban you.

[–] subignition@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It "should" be as easy as a global template inclusion kinda like how wikipedia does donations, but i wouldn't be surprised if fandom doesn't allow that to happen

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia uses CentralNotice which fandom doesn’t allow individual wikis to configure. But there’s https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Help:Site_notice

[–] frog@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

The only thing more rage-inducing than getting stuck in a game and needing to Google the information I need... is finding that information on a Fandom Wiki composed of 90% ads and 10% useful content. Especially since I'm usually searching for that information on my phone, due to not all games handling Alt+Tab particularly well, and Fandom is somehow even worse on a phone. I have genuinely had moments where I've just closed a game and stopped playing because the information I need isn't in the game but has to be found on a Fandom Wiki.

SEO wars only go so far when the user experience on Fandom is so awful that plenty of players would rather scroll down to use the #2 entry in the search results if it means not having to click a Fandom link. They'd only need a few occasions when the #2 entry is a better experience than using Fandom, and they'll start using the independent Wiki purposefully.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what if someone pushes thousands of edits with random AI generated garbage from thousands of accounts?

[–] Friendship@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately they're likely well equipped to deal with that kind of situation as it's not all that different than normal wiki vandalism.

[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Fandom is 95% popups at this point.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It looks pretty bad even with an adblocker on now too

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It works for me, but I recall having to use Ublock's element zapper and custom rules to get around a lot of the shit they pull.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

In what way? The sidebar is possibly the only thing I can think of.

[–] vardogor@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

Oh indeed! But websites should still be borderline functional even without adblock.

I used fandom on my kid's new tablet (we were looking up video game stuff) and it was unusable, no exaggeration.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chloyster@beehaw.org 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh wow it's so much better. Really hope more wikis follow suit

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hope the OSRS wiki really influences others, that wiki is top quality, the best out there honestly. Fandom, fextralife and such can all die in a hole.

I am happy Weird Gloop have decided to host the Minecraft wiki.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah when the osrs wiki team moves I was thinking what's the difference but looking back the move was 100% needed. The new wiki is amazing

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Saw this useful browser extension linked on that page, redirects you away from fandom and hides those results in search: https://getindie.wiki/

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think fandom will do much, remember Uncyclopedia?

[–] atocci@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

No, what happened?

[–] toAIC@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

Warframe next plz 🙏

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This might be going back a while, I haven't played or looked anything up in along time, but back in the early days was the minecraft wiki not already its own site. At what point did they move to fandom? It's good they're moving, but why did they ever go there in the first place?

They were originally on Gamepedia, which got bought out by Fandom.