this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

Interesting Global News

2895 readers
304 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sweden started building a final storage facility for spent nuclear fuel on Wednesday, only the second such site in the world, where highly radioactive waste will be stored for 100,000 years.

Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250116073617/https://www.arctictoday.com/sweden-starts-building-100000-year-storage-site-for-spent-nuclear-fuel/

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.arctictoday.com%2Fsweden-starts-building-100000-year-storage-site-for-spent-nuclear-fuel%2F

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

What SCP containment site is that?

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think that is awesome, but the thumbnail image is totally giving T-Virus vibes.

[–] Bubs@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Had to look it up myself.

The T-Virus from the Resident Evil series:

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Also The Hive, just being huge and underground:

(Picture of The Hive from Resident Evil)

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we store nazis in there instead?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 15 hours ago

Thats where you get mutated nazis. According to some ~~games~~ studies I did, that's a bad idea

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

New place of honor dropped

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

[...] will consist of 60 km of tunnels buried 500 metres down in 1.9 billion year old bedrock.

Are 500 meters deep enough?

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

500m is the industry standard depth for deep geological repositories for nuclear waste

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's way more than is needed to block any radiation.

[–] obolstitelkisok@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about archeologists of a distant future?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Start turning the words to don't change colour kitty

[–] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I think that's still being debated or decided or refined. Warnings or signage need to be interpreted correctly in 80,000 years.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Google hostile architecture for nuclear waste sites.

It's better than a skull and crossbones in my opinion

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

I mean, really the only thing that's gonna expose them is plate tectonics. Just to give a sense of scale, America and Europe are diverging by 4 cm/yr, so will be 500 metres farther from each other, horizontally, in about 10,000 years. Geologically stable regions (called cratons) would not experience such motion vertically for much, much, much longer.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org -2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And yet I keep hearing from nuclear fans that there's nothing to worry about and that it's safe. And how is this cheaper than renewable. That place has to be maintained and secured for 100,000 years.

If we put that onto our timeline, we were just getting out of Africa and using stone tools.

That's not the sort of gift we should be leaving our descendents. Okay we have to deal with what we have, but we shouldn't be making any more of the stuff. Because there will be an accident somewhen down the line.

[–] Aufgehtsabgehts@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

People wanting to save the environment for our children, by leaving nuclear waste with a half life time of 24.000 to billions of years for them to take care of, are a certain kind of stupid.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 2 points 16 hours ago

That's the bit I don't understand either.

[–] BearGun@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The whole point of doing it this way is that it doesn't need to be maintained. Once it's full you just fill the tunnels up (probably with dirt and/or rock) and close them off and you're good, it'll sit there for those 100,000 years.

[–] RidderSport@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've heard those lines way too often. You cannot build in a way that guarantees safety for every scenario. Your concrete fails, water erodes into the caverns, earthquakes, volcanos, or simply someone digging in that spot. How the hell do you believe we can build something that pasts for longer than mankind has documented it self in any way? The Nazis failed to build something that would last a thousand years, that is a fraction of the time you claim will be absolutely safe

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

It's a lot harder to "build" an empire to last 1000 years while simultaneously going to war with everyone though.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org -2 points 1 day ago

No security or monitoring? No warnings about digging or mining?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

And yet it's still better than destroying the global environment.