this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
601 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

4825 readers
1164 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago

They need wide roads. Who knows how fat Kim Jong Un is going to get?

[–] lurklurk@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're cosplaying a successful country

[–] spamspeicher@feddit.org 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe they are a cargo cult? Build big streets and the wealth will come!

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

They are going all for that induced demand. Research shows that building one more lane actually increases traffic.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 51 points 2 days ago

But think of the impressive military parades.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Those roads are probably for police and military so they can arrive quickly in case of invasion or citizens becoming uppity.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also why the US highway system was built, btw. The president who championed it, Eisenhower, was the commander of US allied forces during WW2. While there were other benefits, his goal was to be able to quickly transport troops in the event of a Soviet invasion.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but that thing is 4 lanes in either direction. That's a lot of asphalt for a whole bunch of nothing.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Kim must love drag racing I guess

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which was also the real reason Hitler built the Autobahn (or rather, continued and expanded the plans that already existed).

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

And why Eisenhower built the interstates. They even used dod funding

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 116 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's illegal. The amount of citizen with access to enough wealth to own a car is just relatively low

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 130 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Private car ownership is highly restricted. You only have access to a car if you are a party member, are conducting business for the party, or are well connected.

Their society is very localized and travel is restricted(you need a permit to leave your county), trains and bicycles are how you move about if you aren't walking.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nice, they've solved the climate crisis. It truly is the greatest country.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If every nation could only be a failed state with a 60% poverty level and be propped up by multiple superpowers, we could totally kick the can at least another generation.

America: Hold my beer

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

LOL, if one can afford a car in NK, it must be a dream to drive it. Roads as wide as in California with none of the traffic.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one driving on it and it’s still full of potholes and poorly patched.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An empty road full of potholes and the only other people driving are people I probably know by name?

This is Mario Kart IRL

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

That banana peel with rot before it gets someone

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I don't think these roads stretch very far.

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

They don't want anyone to go anywhere without being extra nice. It's not car centered city, it's a huge prison.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why are all the trees dead?

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Insane you found 4 of the same looking tree. If you look closely you can see the branch structure is super similar

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

They even painted the ground to match the tree type smh

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I imagine one person deliberately took all 4 pics

[–] atlas@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

i doubt it, that's too much work for one person

[–] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

They are still waiting on their permits for water.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That’s a city.