222
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 180 points 11 months ago

Comprehensive sex ed teaches students how to say no. It teaches them what to look out for if some creep is trying to groom them.

Conservatives prefer their victims to be naive.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 61 points 11 months ago

It also teaches kids that there is such a thing as an unforgivable action, IE that it is not just their right to, but bordering on their duty to set and enforce boundaries that they have the right to cut people out of their lives for breaching.

There is nothing conservatives fear more in this world than the idea of something that can permanently earn them the judgement and condemnation of others. To be judged by the content of their character, and that alone.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 16 points 11 months ago

And that it isn't the fault of the one in a position of power when they rape, but the naive one.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

And not just for sexual assault, sexual shame is openly praticed as a mind control mechanism

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago

You got that right.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago
[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

There are areligious people who are nevertheless puritanical.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Sure, but they're just victims of cultural spillover from religion. It's all rooted in religion.

[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I respectfully disagree. It's rooted in patriarchy, which utilizes religion as a method of systemic reinforcement. There are plenty of religions that aren't sexually repressive.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I suspect this as well. Most people alive today were born into a highly religious culture. 85% of America was Christian in 200 and it was even higher the farther back you go

[-] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago

I have an acquaintance who, if anyone ever talks about the subject of sex Ed around, he will insist that they will just teach the kids about blood play and it will spread STDs.

So that's the level of logic we may be dealing with here.

[-] tipicaldik@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

I have a reaallly stupid niece-in-law who prefers to keep her daughter from hanging out with her little cousin (my grand-daughter) because my daughter taught her own daughter that it's called a vagina and not a tee-tee or what-ever-the-fuck the niece-in-law insists on calling it. She literally does not want her daughter exposed to the word 'vagina'. I think the world of my nephew, but his wife can kick rocks...

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 22 points 11 months ago

When my child was young a doctor told me that if a child is sexually abused and doesn't use the proper words to describe their genitals the chance of conviction drops drastically.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Isolation is how abuse happens.

Isolating children from the knowledge they can use to express how and if their boundaries are crossed only serves predators.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

I said something similar on r/politics on Reddit and they banned me for homophobia. I was like WTF?

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

I feel like there must be a lot of context missing there.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Knowing reddit these days, probably not

[-] roy_mustang76@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 months ago

The context is that the mods of r/politics have long had a reputation for being inconsistent and erratic in various ways.

Obviously I don't actually know the full context, but it strikes me as utterly plausible given the likelihood of a report by someone who disagreed with them and a mod team prone to shooting from the hip

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

The context is that reddit is run by nazi sympathizers.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Reddit's ran by nazis

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Reddit is dumb like that

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

And that, indeed, is the purpose.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I understand why books that tell kids about sex are causing conservative parents to freak out, because conservative parents hold a bizarre belief that everyone has to just pretend sex isn’t happening all around the world all the time. For some reason, this totally normal part of life must never, ever be discussed openly, and kids especially must for some reason believe in storks until a certain age.

I think conservative parents are only afraid of teaching kids about sex because they’re afraid of sex.

[-] JimmyChanga@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

I also have a suspension they don't want the kids able to identify the inappropriate sexual abuse they are committing on the kids, startling how often these uptight cunts end up being pedos.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Idk, where I’m from, sex ed is minimal and abstinence only, parents can still pull kids out of it and the bulk of parents that do had their first child before age sixteen.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Yes. And want to seem surprised.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago

A lot of good answers here. One component I haven't seen here is that a lot of parents have this naive notion that their kids are complete Innocents and they'll stay that way if no one tells them about things like sex. It's moronic because they've forgotten that when they were kids they got urges and experimented whether someone explained things to them or not. They want their kids ignorant to keep them from growing up.

It's even more moronic these days when anyone with internet access can get to all manner of stuff. I personally wanted our kids to get sex education before they got curious and started searching for things that they weren't ready to see or understand.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Remember… marriage is a religious institution. Premarital/extramarital sex is bad because people like having sex and … if you convince everyone that you need to be married to have sex or your going to hell, then the church effectively becomes the arbiter of who can have sex.

Which means all the horny fucks in their congregation follow their rules so they can get married. Also means that the kids will be forced to grow up in the church and gives control of who they happen to start banging… because god is racist and doesn’t like mixed peoples…

[-] Eggyhead@artemis.camp 14 points 11 months ago

I imagine there’s also an aspect of instilling a culture of shame around something that constitutes as a basic human need. That way people will invariably have at least one basic “temptation” to crawl into church to plead forgiveness over before seeking deeper religious indoctrination.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

And do that whole confession thing which would surprise me a lot if it turned out was never used for leverage.

[-] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

don't forget that people who leave the church don't tithe

[-] foyrkopp@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I genuinely believe that all the tabooisation around sex is a holdover from the days where birth control wasn't readily available.

There was an economic incentive for People Who Own Stuff to control procreation, because this allows them to control who inherits their stuff.

There was a personal incentive for most people to control procreation to prevent their children of making A Mistake(tm) by getting stuck with The Wrong Person(tm).

Where there's incentives, they'll wind up being followed. Story as old as time.

Cloaking all that in religion is just window dressing so one doesn't have to admit their true reasoning, but a purely secular pre-contraception society would also have tried to regulate sex.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

At the same time as not contraception, infant mortality was ridiculously high. To the point that people that high estimates put the IMR at about 1/3.

There’s a reason people married young historically- they needed to start getting kids popping out. Or at least that was the mentality. More kids meant more stability and safety. Kids were free labor, the first male would inherit most or everything so that wasn’t really a problem. So they popped out a lot because the first five years were… awful.

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 28 points 11 months ago

Because then they will have the tools to report abuse.

[-] PPQ@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Bingo! This is why Republicans hate all education, because it makes harder for them to be manipulated.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Sex, especially gay sex, is icky. But all sex is actually icky. Unless you're doing it to procreate. Then you make it happen as fast as possible and pray for forgiveness both before and afterward.

[-] koolkiwi@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

You also turn off the lights and shut the curtains, lest you see something!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Missionary position only too.

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 3 points 11 months ago

Banned for homophobia.

[-] Thehalfjew@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

So imagine a society dominated by men.

This society knows that sex is what leads to children. What it doesn't know is how to verify if a child belongs to a particular man.

As this society is patriarchal in nature, it's very important to the leaders/men that their lineage is protected. So they need a way to ensure that children's bloodline can be properly guaranteed. The only way to control that is to make sure that women are bound to a specific man, and that sex with any other man is forbidden/disgusting. This is why bastard children and unwed mothers have historically been treated with such disdain. But men were often given a pass. The women were screwing up lineage tracking.

Tracking is less an issue these days, but the social conditioning is still there. We've forgotten why we prioritized it in the first place (right or wrong). Now it's the way many people think because it's been the way we've behaved for so long, much of society is geared around it being a basic truth.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Well, that article gave me two books to help teach my children! Thanks!

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

For the general public it is because of social conditioning through various means such as society and religion. In truth the powers that be such as social and religious leaders push this concept of "sex is bad" as a means of control. It's all about control. The easiest way to brainwash a bunch of people into doing your bidding is to keep them isolated and frustrated.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

These institutions are pure evil and must be dismantled

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Because they don't want their teens to be forced to give birth.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's the other way around, they want their teens to be forced to give birth...

As one senator(?) put it: it's a beautiful thing when a 12 year old is married and gets pregnant.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
222 points (96.2% liked)

politics

18901 readers
3779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS