this post was submitted on 01 May 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

4289 readers
85 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GamesJoblin@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah Chomsky,an anarchist that regularly tells you to vote Democrats.

[–] ballthrower@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

“Attacking anarchists is not allowed here”

[–] Rafael_Luisi@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Armchair anarchist are worthless backstabbers.

[–] Drstrange2love@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Liberal gives a shitty opinion, reddit mod: "no attack on anarchist", for the action proves that anarchists are liberal.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This mod has been consistently banning MLs off of SLS for a while now. SLS has been taken over by feds...or worse, radlibs.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep. Now GenZedong sub in on that way too, i have been banned there yesterday, with absolutely identical reason as from SLS. Not much lose to be honest, not after the utterly shameful mod post and their capitulation to nazis.

[–] TheConquestOfBed@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I genuinely had no idea Chomsky was an anarchist. I thought he was one of those postmodern post-marxists who write takedowns of Stalin in university libraries.

[–] InvertedMussolini@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Chomsky is what zero materialism does to an MFer. Here he is, literally arguing for MLism in a completely different context:

I'm not in favor of people being in cages.

On the other hand I think people ought to be in cages if there's a saber-toothed tiger wandering around outside and if they go out of the cage the saber-toothed tiger will kill them. So sometimes there's a justification for cages. That doesn't mean cages are good things.

State power is a good example of a necessary cage. There are saber-toothed tigers outside; they are called transnational corporations which are among the most tyrannical totalitarian institutions that human society has devised. And there is a cage, namely the state, which to some extent is under popular control. The cage is protecting people from predatory tyrannies so there is a temporary need to maintain the cage, and even to extend the cage.

🥴

[–] TheConquestOfBed@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this an argument for neolib governments? Lmao. As long as no hammer and sickle it's fine.

[–] InvertedMussolini@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Who knows? Who cares to find out? Chomsky is an ideological windvane.

He's... fine when he's criticizing the US empire but there are much better sources out there and Chomsky is only useful for his prominence but much like Richard Wolff he's got some really trash takes (barely) below the surface.

Is it because he's an op? Is he a reflection of the ideological hangover from the New Left era? Is he just an opportunist? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

pathetic behavior from shit liberals say, they very much fucking know many western anarchists are just radlib idiot pieces of shit