this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
570 points (95.0% liked)

196

18051 readers
524 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, where are 99% of the life begins at conception people on the meat industry?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 92 points 4 months ago (10 children)

If you're really being serious, then the answer is that most (or, at least, the vocal majority) of those people don't even really care about living children. I don't see that type of person generally giving any more care to a non-human being than they would a human being, and they already don't care about people other than themselves.

"Pro-life" has always been a misnomer. More honest descriptions would be "anti-choice" or "pro-forced birth."

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Pro-life

In their mind, is still just breeding more cheap disposable labor

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

It's anti-woman.

The real true reason most people are against abortion isn't because they don't believe it's a necessity. It's because they are afraid that some woman won't be punished for having sex. Whether or not the fetus survives isn't the point, it's that someone has to be punished for enjoying life.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Serious in that they should stand up for non-human animals, but in the kind of way where you also know the answer as to why 99% aren't

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago

One single HUMAN cell, everyone knows humans are above all animals

[–] PigStyle@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Some of them explain this away with "Humans have souls, animals don't".

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 26 points 4 months ago (3 children)

And yet many can be up in arms about dogs & cats being eaten in some regions despite that claim

[–] riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

dogs go to dog heaven, duh
of they got souls! /s

[–] amon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't care what species it is

I have three requirements for meat:

  • It isn't human flesh
  • It isn't rotten
  • It's cooked properly
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Apparently that soul doesn't matter when trying to prevent it from dying from preventable diseases with vaccines and nurturing it with affordable education.

[–] Glytchrider@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Don't you know it's much more preferable for your child to die of a preventable illness than for them to get autism from vaccines which is totally a thing that happens?

/s of course

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It's even worse. One of the contributing factors for autism is fine dust particles in pollution from fossil fuels. And the ones against vaccines are often also the ones for fossil fuels.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

When I infodump for 2 hours straight I can see why they would prefer if I died /s

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yeah but if babies were delicious we would eat them too

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this implying you know for certain that human babies aren't? Maybe we should be a little concerned how you figured that one out

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So I ate a baby big whoop wanna fight about it?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago

Baby Big Whoop? Damn there's a whole product line now?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've got a modest proposal for you...

[–] Glytchrider@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

I wanted to say that but wasn't swift enough.

[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm told humans taste like pork.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Some cultures that actually have cannibalism refer to human flesh as "long pig" or similar because of the resemblance.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They are pro-birth. They are absolutely not pro-life.

[–] celeste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I think they're anti-woman.

[–] ookiiBoy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

Think? We fucking know.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

That explains the obsession with cows' milk...

Anytime someone throws a fit about noncows milk being called milk, "Like, you know why they produce milk, right?"

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 9 points 4 months ago (21 children)

It's racism. They think human lives are more important than other races.

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is so prevalent that this type of bigotry actually has its own name: specieism

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago

beat me to it (by only 11h :D)

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

The human race thinks they're the supreme race, better than the other races.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I'm still waiting for them to stop celebrating birthdays.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But that's different!

Honestly though, is "but it's different" a proper informal fallacy?

load more comments
view more: next ›