this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
683 points (98.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

21280 readers
1442 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Horrabin@programming.dev 39 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is probably more accurate:

-Who the fuck wrote such a shit!

-WHO???

-...

-Oh... it was me...

[–] fayoh@sopuli.xyz 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Me at a previous workplace.

-This is a piece of shit, who is the code owner of this module.

  • Ah, it's me ("inheriting" code ownership when someone left was common)

  • Who did this change

  • Ah, it was me

  • Surely I just made a minor change to this line here, who wrote the function.

  • it was me, it was me all the way down

Fits the general theme of the thread as it was not giving any trouble for a year before being found.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The more frustrated you are when running git blame the more likely the command turns out to be a mirror.

[–] Horrabin@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

This is where the programmer's way to humbleness starts :-D

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Last time that happened to me, it was a mirror, but also not.

I had moved functions from one file to another without changing the contents. As a result, all those lines referred to me.

And since I started thinking, I found this

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

Good link that, I'll have to add those flags to my list of aliases

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Accurate, except the bottom right panel only happens in very limited circumstances, hardly ever after a year has passed.

Source: I've been writing software since 1983 or so.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Yeah same, also I don't usually need a year to think that. The next day often works. 😅

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And I always think I write good comments until a year later I'm like these comments don't help shit

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Try to write as if you are explaining the functionality to an unrelated 3rd party like a new hire.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, write it for the person who has to replace you when you inevitably get laid off so that your company can hire someone for half your salary.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago

Don't be a dick to your (current) co-workers.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Me during code reviews of other people

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

There’s an exponential amount of time between each panel. 1 hour, 5 hours, 2 days for the answer.

[–] Reptorian@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago

Sometimes, I just rewrite my code until it is good enough. Other times, I leave it to my memory, so I can figure it out later. And others, I'm just not happy about it, like the times I did bigbin2dec and it would only work well with something like thread-ripper.

[–] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

This is why you're meant to comment your code.

Your code tells you "what", your comments tell you "why".

Here's a good review of comments in the redis codebase: https://antirez.com/news/124

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

s/year/week/

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

To be fair, this is also me when I look at a network setup years later. (I do IT with a specialty in networks)

[–] stubing@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago