this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
430 points (99.1% liked)

Comic Strips

14750 readers
1745 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bisby@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

My comment from last time this was posted.

The most commonly cited monitor in recent years for this is “AW3423DWF”… Which is AlienWare 34" from 2023, DisplayPort, WQHD, Freesync.

Point is, people see a lot of characters and complain when in reality it is exactly what you are referring to. The name is an encoded version of its capabilities. Its just that the encoding isn’t always clear because if every company used the same encoding they would have the same name. and if there are 2 similar monitors you would need to have every feature in the name to differentiate them, so the shorthand encoding becomes necessary. (Eg, AW3423DW and AW3423DWF only really differ on freesync vs gsync, thus the F at the end)

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

i think bundling these features together in a brand name and incrementing it with version number would be more helpful.

having the "alienware porkchop 23" would allow people to become familiar with the branding and understand the featureset that this model comes with.

dwf does not mean anything to most.

[–] bisby@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

That only works if you assume that there is something consistent to version. Some years it's a 34" ultra wide, some years it's a 32" 4k. Will there ever be another 34" ultra wide from alienware? Who knows! Not every monitor gets a revision. and if you have random names for 100 different monitors every year, that doesn't really help make sense of things either.

Alienware Monitor 7.... Well they release 100 different models a year, and every year thats going to increment, and consumers often conflate "bigger number better" so you better make sure you get the numbering right.

And "Porkchop" means absolutely nothing to anyone. DWF at least means something to some people. Going from 0% usefulness to even 10% usefulness is a good move.

[–] shortrounddev@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Do monitors keep a stable amount of features from one generation to the next? I mean the only real reason to upgrade a monitor is for new features, not because it has incrementally improved on the features it already offered, or size maybe. What would be the basis for calling something a "porkchop" vs a "lizard milkshake"

I guess you could have like 3 tiers of features, going from Cheapest to most Expensive (i.e, lower end is 60hz, higher end 120+hz) and then each generation you know which monitor is "better"

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Can you decipher this one for me please?

34GP63A-B

Only the 34 makes sense.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 48 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Sony and everything that isn't a PlayStation

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I‘m sure the Playstation also has a horrible internal model name. It would be necessary to distinguish different variants.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 29 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 8 points 8 hours ago

Japan received the SCPH-1000, North America received the SCPH-1001, and Europe received the SCPH-1002.

i do not like this

[–] pastel_de_airfryer 1 points 5 hours ago

Ah yes, the very sensible named headphones WH1000-XM# and the earbuds WM1000-XM#, where the # is the generation

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The naming pattern makes it easier to have different "models" per major retailer. This hinders consumer price comparisons.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Are monitors mattresses now?

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

Always have been. Or at least since the beginning of the world wide web.
Stores had long used the "low price guarantee" slogan to draw customers. And they had trained the average customer to believe that it meant they had the lowest prices. Back in those days price comparisons were hard. Sales ads changed every week or two but other than what was in the ads you had to go from store to store checking the price yourself. Yes, you could call around to different stores, but that was unreliable. Even just getting stores phone numbers was a hassle. Plus, most stores didn't have their inventory computerized, and the ones that did were only close to correct once a year, right after they did their yearly inventory. So they just had to keep track of a couple of their closest and biggest competitors. If you tried hard enough you could save a few dollars, but it was rare and took a lot of effort. Most people would settle on what they thought was the "best store" and just stick with it. Even when a competitor had a sale at a significantly lower price that was simple enough for them to deal with, they would just pull their stock from the shelves and put a sign on it in the back room that said don't sell until a certain date. If you shopped somewhere like Sears or circuit City where their sales people worked on commission, You could sometimes develop a relationship with one of the veteran sales people as "your guy". And they would be able to have this insane knack for "searching the storeroom" for you and "mysteriously" finding the "last box that had been misplaced".
Then Walmart came on the scene and was a huge pain in the ass by actually having cheaper prices on a lot of things. Enough companies complained that eventually a few suppliers would have a special model number for a few high dollar items that they sold to Walmart and then a different model number for everyone else. But this was only on a few things like computer stuff and car stereos.
And then the internet came along and they were forced to slowly start giving just about every store "unique models".

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago

Higher quality models? No, same for TVs, an LG C3 is an LG C3 no matter where you buy it. But base models? Heck yeah.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's also a pain in the ass when there are different models for different regions (where presumably all they do is change the power cable, packaging and regulatory stuff, possibly sneak in localized ads) and you can't find reviews.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 8 hours ago

Ah, yes. Like my highly successful
LG V ~60~ ^ThinQ^ 5GUW | DualScreen

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 hours ago
[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SilverShark@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago
3. Year
 * Two digit year it was released.

Very cool, but not Y2K compliant.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 hours ago

Jacob named HDDs, too!

[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 7 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Give credit to Apple here, they’re one of the only brands with sensible product names. “Apple Studio Display” “iPhone 16” etc.

I wish more brands did this.

Shoutout to PlayStation too, but not the rest of Sony 😂

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

They're also not perfect:

  • Apple pencil
  • Apple pencil (2th gen)
  • Apple pencil (USB-C)
  • Apple pencil pro

I believe the Apple pencil pro > Apple pencil (USB-c) > Apple pencil (2th gen) > Apple pencil, but it's very unclear IMO.

[–] skizzles@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Are we forgetting the actual model names?

Macbook Air - Mine is A2337. They do have arbitrary model numbers for all of their stuff too. Guaranteed they do the same thing with their pens, pencils, and other stuff. It's just that most consumers rarely pay attention to them. To be fair though, most of the apple model numbers I've seen are similar to what I said above which is not nearly as bad as how they do TVs lol.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

2th

Talk about "bone apple teeth" 😅

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Say it with a lisp. Seconth.

[–] Infernal_pizza@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago

Except for the M series ultra and max chips, I can never remember which is the higher spec

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

MagSafe has entered the chat

[–] Mesophar@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Even Apple isn't great with that. They often have different models for earlier and later in the year, various variants of each size, and little distinguishing features other than model number- same as those monitors.

It just isn't as visible on their products as much, because they at least try to make it more simple for consumers.but monitors often have model line, size, and resolution short hand to differentiate as well.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 hours ago

Not wrong, but don't tell me you were never like

Which of these shitty camera phones has the best resolution

I can't read the model number and its even worse with bifocals!