this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
71 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

46479 readers
1393 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] libra00@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Inertia, convenience of what you're used to, and all of your friends are over there and have never heard of 'the fediverse'.

[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Same reason why people stick with wells Fargo even if they can move to a credit union. It takes effort, changes to habit, and risk just to gain... what you already have.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 hour ago

Most people don't care about things. This is kind of a recurring problem. Imagine if people just cared a little bit more. All sorts of problems, like littering, would just go away.

But people are lazy and don't care. They don't care that their behavior today will be a problem for them tomorrow.

The big sites are where the content is, and that's what they want. Suffering a little bit of hardship (fewer memes) in order to bolster a stronger future? Ridiculous.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Centralized social media is where their friends are.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Is there a TikTok replacement in the Fediverse? The main reason my wife uses it is because the recommendations are the best. Feel like you have to do more self searching here.

[–] tatermangia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The apps absolutely own your phone data and any browser instance the user is logged in to. The issue is not the content, it's the device data permission data...GPS, SMS, WA, FB, real location, browser searches, etc....all go to tiktok, meta, et al.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Honestly when switching from Reddit to here that is the thing I missed the most. It was a lot better at serving you things you liked compared to here where you can only really sort by either what's active or popular or what you're subscribed to. I get some people really like that but a lot of people want it to be more personalized to them without having to go search for the things they want. It's also great for discovering new things because sure I can setup my subscriptions to show what I like but then it won't make connections and show me new things I might like. Combine that with there being less content and therefore certain areas of interest not being represented here at all makes mainstream social media better for most people.

[–] grid11@lemy.nl 8 points 7 hours ago

Because most people haven't gone far enough to even understand this question. The choices come prepackaged, that's what in front of their eyes, so they assume that's how it suppose to be, and take the easy ride

[–] tfm@europe.pub 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because of network effects.

Building a social network is hard. A typical chicken or egg problem. If you don't have a user base, nobody is willing to join, and if nobody joins, you don't have a user base.

It usually requires a bunch of money to build a social network.

The fediverse has a long time to go but I believe it will win sooner or later.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'd also chalk it up to convenience.

The Fediverse requires effort.

[–] tfm@europe.pub 3 points 8 hours ago
[–] bambootstrap@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The Fediverse is a confusing concept. I’m a giant nerd and even I don’t really understand how this is supposed to work. Centralized platforms provide a more straightforward user experience. And as others have said, that’s where the content is right now.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's no more confusing than using email, and everybody managed to figure that out. You don't need to know how the nitty gritty of it works. The network effects is a far bigger issue, as you point out, centralized platforms simply have far more content on them.

[–] BellaDonna@mujico.org 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's far more complicated than email, at least I can send an email to any valid address from any other address by default ( mostly ) - Lemmy / Fediverse is like needing multiple email addresses that each one can only email some of the others, and you might not even get the response someone sent you unless the content is literally carried back to you.

I have multiple accounts on multiple instances, and sometimes I come across posts I read with one account, but my comments or the responses to those comments just aren't there, so you only get a portion of what is out there.

It's kinda a terrible experience in that way.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

The whole point of ActivityPub is that you don't need multiple accounts on different servers. You can use your Lemmy account to talk to people on Mastodon, browse PixelFed, watch PeerTube. Yes, there is sometimes lag in content propagating, and so on, but it's clearly not a show stopper. My experience using Lemmy and Mastodon is the opposite of terrible.

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because I have no clue what the Fediverse is.

[–] SendPrudes@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago

Yeah and I wasn’t sure what it mean on account creation to commit to a server fully. I ended up getting a lot of supportive comments when I did ask.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

There are going to be layers to this.

  1. There are lots of people who are just downright too stupid. They wouldn't be on the internet at all if Tim Apple didn't put it in a baby baba for them to suck it out of. They use Facebook because their iPhone came with the Facebook app pre-installed.

  2. There are lots of people for whom popularity is the only thing that exists. Their brain cannot function beyond "Everyone uses Twitter." They'll adopt this platform only after everyone else in the world does.

  3. There are lots of people who have bought the propaganda. The dark web is for drug traffickers and hitmen, torrenting is for pirates, end-to-end encryption is for traitors, and Mastodon is for Linux neckbeards. You shouldn't associate with those people.

  4. There's this weird trend where the commercial platforms are becoming hives for conservatives, so they're probably going to stay put in their echo chambers. I have observed little to no presence of actual conservatives on this platform; beyond the horseshoe effect with the tankie crowd.

  5. The culture of content consumption is not supported by the Fediverse. We don't do algorithmic slop troughs here, and the amount of content on Peertube and Loops rounds down to zero, so it doesn't fulfill the role of mesmerizing colors and sounds for staring at and drooling like Tiktok does or linear television did.

  6. Open source software is usually a bit shit. Be it lack of budget, opinionated developers, redundant projects...we can never have one of something. Why does Lemmy, Mbin and Piefed exist simultaneously? We always end up with software that mostly works, has a lot less graphical polish, a shitty project name, a few missing key features and a couple workarounds you just have to know about. Or an intentionally godawful UI. That'll put people off.

  7. A few people who show up are going to be put off by the weirdest decision they'll be asked to make this month: "Choose an instance, your choice doesn't matter, just pick one." If it doesn't matter, why make me pick? I bet if you watched 100 people try to sign up for a Fediverse platform, at least 30 of them will balk at that stage. I've sat and stared at that for awhile myself and I'm one of the ones who made it through.

  8. They just haven't heard of us. Ask ten people you know in real life if they've heard of Lemmy, or Mastodon, or Pixelfed. I bet they haven't, or if they have they let it pass in one ear and out the other out of apathy.

  9. A few people have looked at the Fediverse, didn't see what they wanted here, and left. If you play Satisfactory, for example, you'll find an active subreddit where the majority of the player base and the developers of the game interact, on Lemmy you'll find one community where exactly one person posts "daily screenshots until I get bored." It's easy to wander off, especially if you don't like left wing politics, Linux and the Fediverse itself.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 28 minutes ago

Gotta say, the biggest reason I'm not on Pixedfed is because I was told that I could migrate my instagram content, but the two instances I signed up for had that option disabled. I can't seem to find an instance that tells you upfront if it's allowed or not, and I've already wasted enough time on it.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

“Choose an instance, your choice doesn’t matter, just pick one.” If it doesn’t matter, why make me pick?

Email requires you to pick a provider, but it doesn't matter.

"To use your new iPhone, create an iCloud account."

Gmail advertised superior features before also becoming required for using an Android device.

sure, any service gets you sneding and receiving email, but most people these days end up with an email address as a consequence of some other decision they've made.

I think when people falk about #7, it needs to be revised to "your choice of instance doesn't matter when you're a noob. By the time it does matter, you'll understand what you want from an instance and can simply make another account"

Agree on all other points though. I hope Lemmy keeps growing and getting more active. A lot of the communities I've joined only have a few posts in the past year.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

As always, there's multiple reasons for things. You did a great job breaking down as much as possible :) the other comments are all right, but you are comprehensive :)

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think the average user thinks much about the platform they're on, and about who controls it. I think they go to wherever most of their family/friends are.

Also, those platforms are firmly in the mainstream, the alternatives aren't really - you'd have to actively go search for them. People just aren't likely to do that, I don't think.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] meaansel@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I asked someone on bluesky i follow what is mastodon lacking that they ultimately chose bluesky, and they said something along the lines "basic ease of use. The way it works is probably perfectly sensible to fediverse people, but I had an awful time there"

They do indeed have (abandoned) mastodon account with posts, so they did try. I don't know what they meant by it lacking basic ease of use, and I didn't feel entitled to ask stranger for more explanation. But it wasn't picking instance, since they already had an account on one of them.

The only thing I personally noticed is off is following people on other instances if you're not looking at them via your instance website Identity not being perfectly transferrable on mastodon. You can post a special "follow me there instead" post, but what if your instance went tyrant and wouldn't let you post it? Or just went offline? I think cryptographic identity would be more robust for that, but it would also mean user having to store private key somewhere, which would be even less user-friendly

[–] kobra@lemm.ee 19 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)
  1. Ease of use

The combination of having to choose an instance and then start with an algorithm free blank slate is a tough ask. It literally takes time to sit down and setup your initial “feed”, which is probably a good thing, but not at all what attracts users whimsical curiosities nor what they’ve experienced over their entire existence with social media.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Evolution of human behaviour is slow. Right now we are all enmeshed in the dawning discovery that the current way we run society is falling apart at the seams. Just enter the core of almost any city in North America and you'll see what I mean (and not just N. America). It'll take a while to set itself right, or it may all just burn in a raging nuclear fire launched by a pissed off oligarch who does not get his way.

Definitely not forward progress towards a better day.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

This. And some people just want to post in front of a crowd. So far I like Lemmy because there's more conversation going on. And less "Look at me!" posts.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 4 points 11 hours ago

I like to follow a couple reporters directly as opposed to subscribing to the local paper and wading through the fluff pieces, so that means using Bluesky.

Back when I was still an artist for my super niche internet garbage, that meant using Tumblr, then after the Tumblr purge, Twitter. Then after Musk, cohost, then after cohost... I mean, I was done with art but I'd probably be on Bluesky for that too.

[–] phanto@lemmy.ca 40 points 19 hours ago

In my IT program at school, the only people who have heard of the fediverse are the ones I've told.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 29 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

People follow the crowd and centralized media had considerably bigger crowds

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 11 points 16 hours ago

Several of these platforms used bots and/or multiple staff accounts to inflate user count/engagement to draw more people in and trigger the network effect.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 25 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t think federation vs centralization is the primary differentiator. I think corporate vs non-profit/ad-free/donation-only/volunteerism is. Our marketing budget is goose egg. It’s all word-of-mouth.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I keep pushing for join-lemmy.org to buy ads on Google and Bing.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I can also see some people being opposed to them spending the donation money on ads, since they'd be giving money to companies that may be in opposition to what we're doing here (or ideological reasons around the advertising industry in general).

Maybe if there was a separate pool of donations specifically for advertising, then people who want to support that can donate to it? Those who don't can still donate to the projects themselves

[–] IndianaJones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago

Ads on the street (like at bus stops) could work well too

[–] username_no_1@lemm.ee 17 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The more people using a social media platform, the more content there is to consume and people to interact with. It's really hard to move to a new platform when there just isn't as much stuff to consume as the centralized platforms like Reddit. I'm using Lemmy for ideological reasons, but if you just want to vibe and scroll online, Reddit has way more to offer. That said, the user experience of Reddit is continually degrading. Potentially at some point it will create enough refugees that sites like Lemmy hit an inflection point of users.

[–] pheet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 13 hours ago

To add, e.g. reddit took years to become a great platform and it also degradation takes years, as the alternatives will also take years to build. Although some of the issues will probably follow too unless addressed some way. I don’t think the federation is a silver bullet but I’m hopefull that it’s a big step forward.

[–] Lasagna@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

100%. Lemmy just happens to have the communities I’m interested in.

I remember trying to move to Mastodon years ago. But the main topics in my feed were furries, transgenders and activists.

Not hating on any of those, but it just wasn’t what I was interested in at the time, so I quit the whole microblogging thing altogether and spent more time on Reddit.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago

Because all their contacts and photos are already there.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because they actually have content and friends there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 8 points 19 hours ago

Sounds like a question for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›