this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
124 points (95.6% liked)

Europe

4298 readers
1922 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Brit here, not sure how it is in Germany but the UK fucked up recruitment with two main problems (from my perspective as a member of Gen Z)

  • We treat veterans like shit the same as the US does
  • We functionally have no territorial army, militia or equivelent, we used to but now those are elegible for overseas deployment which ruins the entire purpose of signing up to be better able to defend your homeland.
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 17 hours ago

Kids were never ready for war. We just never bothered asking them.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps it's the military that is outdated.

I've been thinking about that several decades ago, watching my friends come back from the military training with completely useless skills regardless of their ranks. The "war time" skillset and communication are based on ideals from the 1950s. It's been allowed to exist as a separate culture inside the military only because the authorities inside the military keeps repeating the same ideas through generations.

There's no doubt that military work does require a very efficient and brutally direct communication, but the top down chain of command and hierachy often fails to take advantage of more modern skills where communication happens more efficiently across networks instead of tree-shaped structures, and where every node is important, not just as a link in a chain.

Businesses have had many of the same experiences with generation Z. They don't want to play the role of the pawn in chess and would rather walk away than take orders blindly. I don't blame them, but it's obviously a bad starting point for army recruitment. The military will have to come up with something new to address the issue.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 18 hours ago

Our time is one where traditional ways aren't worth it, or in many cases even possible

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck war! No one should be in the military, those who cause wars should go and fight them instead of sending others.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 19 hours ago

Sure, but unless you can get Putin to come out, someone has to kill several thousand Russians each week

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I’m a millennial who was happy to not be required to go through military training back when it was still a thing but already phasing out. Bundeswehr was a thing for gun fanatics and manly men, nothing that was actually necessary. I was a pacifist. My work ethics today are now close to what Gen Z apparently has. Work is simply not the center of my life anymore.

These days I’m wondering if a 40 year old man (in better shape than my 18 year old self though) can still enlist voluntarily because I want to fight for our European values. I’d rather die in battle than being occupied by power hungry dictators. Not sure this Gen Z guy understands that his work life balance days are over if that happens.

[–] Schorsch@feddit.org 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This article I read some hours ago is relevant.

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Very interesting, thank you!

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My problem with that is that I will be fighting for those old fucks sitting in the seats of power making decisions about our lives and living comfortably and safely.

I will die fighting if I have to, but it will be defending my house and my relatives, that's my compromise, I will not be sent to defend some random piece of land

[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s one of the last pieces of land where we ourselves still have some power over those old fucks. But democracy is fragile.

[–] tabloid@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're absolutely not too old to join the Bundeswehr. Depending on your life situation you could opt to do a FWD (voluntary military service) for at least 7 months or be trained as untrained civilian in the "Ungedient" programme in distinct blocks to not impact your day to day life so much. I would advise to contact your local recruitment office and talk to them, you can get their guidance on your individual situation without signing any commitments.

Thanks for the info!

[–] peaches@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am also a millenial, a woman. And I agree with you. Rather fight for liberty than in a dictatorship. I‘ve already lived in a dictatorship the first years of my life, and although a kid, I do remember what was like and my parent did explain to us that there are other things outside the bubble, that there is freedom outside. We were told not to talk about it outside of the family, of course, because of security police.

I like the system that the Swiss have, to have all your population trained. To also know how to handle guns and be working in a team snd whatever they do to train. And they get refreshers every year according to Le Chat: Yes, Swiss citizens who have completed their basic military training are required to participate in annual refresher courses. Specifically, after finishing basic training, individuals remain members of the Armed Forces for nine years and must complete six refresher courses, each lasting three weeks, during this period. These courses ensure that their military skills remain up-to-date and that they are prepared for any potential service requirements. The obligation to serve in the military or alternative civilian service typically applies from age 18 to 30 .„

I would not enter in that age requirement anymore, but I would still love to do it. It is never a bad idea to be prepared, even if you don’t have to use your skills. Also to learn how to sabotage possible invaders, I think it would be invaluable in case of war. Look at Ukraine when they were invaded. There are a lot of stories of normal people fighting greatly against the surprise invasion.

And a war nowadays would look different than what was in WW2. I am far from being an expert, I am none, but the military equipment modern Europe has, is different even of what they sent to Ukraine. I think they sent a lot of old stuff. And having fighter jets and stuff like that, would be more helpful for the fight.

I read the other day someone from Finland, I think, saying that their goal this year is to learn to fly drones, so he could help in case of Russian attack. Fighting for Europe does not mean always being on the frontline with a gun in your hands.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I am Swiss. Let me tell you, our army is a joke. The system is there but it's only on paper. The leaders are cowardly bureaucrats stuck in 1975 level thinking. It's an amassment of stupid people who can't make it in the private sector. No one with a quarter of a brain can stand being in that organisation.

[–] CT0201@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

With planes the orange traitor can turn off at will

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago

Military service is a hard concept to grasp when you're sitting comfy at home, not a care in the world and all the conflicts are "over there".

It's a very different story when there is an existential threat looming over your head, weighing on your shoulders like a mountain. Canada's armed forces is already meeting its yearly recruitment targets due to repeated threats of invasion from the United States.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 37 points 1 day ago (17 children)

But one senior army commander said members of Generation Z — renowned in the business world for their efforts to reshape corporate culture — were also going into the armed forces with different ideas and outlooks. “People are vulnerable, they cry easily,” he said. “They talk about work-life balance.”

“I understand that,” the commander added. “They grew up in a different time. It’s not a bad perspective. But it doesn’t match that well with a wartime situation.”

Work-life balance obviously goes out the window in a war (actually, life itself does). Does being vulnerable really preclude you from being brave, though?

[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We live in a hyper-individualistic society which is self-centred. This is only exacerbated by social media, where attention and being the main character is more important than ever. The new generation is living more and more in society. Instead of being part of society. Being part of something bigger is uncommon nowadays. Which makes participation in something as extreme as a war unfathomable. If you look at countries with high levels of civil sense like Taiwan. We see school uniforms and military service. Kids are being raised to be part of a free and democratic society, not to just live in it.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 17 hours ago

Personally I've always been a bullied outcast. Society didn't want me, why do I owe them shit?

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I can't really provide evidence for or against that in recent years, but I'll point out the greatest generation grew up during the literal great depression.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In a book published this week, Why I Would Never Fight for My Country, the 27-year-old argues ordinary people should not be sent into battle on behalf of nation states and their rulers — even to fend off an invasion. Occupation by a foreign power might lead to a “shitty” life, he told the Financial Times. “But I’d rather be occupied than dead.”

Is he familiar with occupied Palestine?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago

the dude with that photo… i never seen someone so out of touch, a 27 year old boomer

[–] spechter@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Occupied ~~Poland~~ ~~Algeria~~ ~~China~~ ~~Ukraine~~

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] splendoruranium@infosec.pub 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can't blame anyone for not wanting to risk their lhealth or even lives. More and more people doing that is probably a good thing in general. Brings everyone closer to making the old adage "imagine there's war and nobody comes" a reality.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 37 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It can only be a good thing if the enemy shares the same values, which is not the case with Russia.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago

Heat pump installers fight against Putin's power source: oil and gas. That's half the GDP

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›